These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7331777)

  • 21. A comparison of Peritest automated perimetry and Goldmann perimetry.
    Hotchkiss ML; Robin AL; Quigley HA; Pollack IP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1985 Mar; 103(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 3977715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An automatic perimeter for glaucoma visual field screening and control. Construction and clinical cases.
    Heijl A; Krakau CE
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1975 Oct; 197(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 1081847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Reproducibility of central visual field testing using kinetic or computerized static perimetry (author's transl)].
    Gramer E; Pröll M; Krieglstein GK
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1980 Mar; 176(3):374-84. PubMed ID: 7420997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
    Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of different screening methods for the detection of visual field defects in early glaucoma.
    Marraffa M; Marchini G; Albertini R; Bonomi L
    Int Ophthalmol; 1989 Jan; 13(1-2):43-5. PubMed ID: 2744954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of Fieldmaster automated perimeter for the detection of early visual field changes in glaucoma.
    Hong C; Kitazawa Y; Shirato S
    Int Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 4(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 7068332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Computerized and manual perimetry in patients with severe temporal visual field defects due to suprasellar tumors].
    Pereira A; Monteiro ML
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2005; 68(5):587-91. PubMed ID: 16322852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The Fieldmaster-200 computer perimeter: a comparative, controlled clinical study of its sensitivity and specificity in glaucomatous field defects (author's transl)].
    Krieglstein GK; Glaab E; Gramer E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1981 Nov; 179(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 7040780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Short-wavelength automated perimetry and motion automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Weinreb RN
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1997 Sep; 115(9):1129-33. PubMed ID: 9298053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Peritest, a new automatic and semi-automatic perimeter.
    Greve EL; Dannheim F; Bakker D
    Int Ophthalmol; 1982 Nov; 5(3):201-14. PubMed ID: 7152803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automated suprathreshold screening for glaucoma: the Baltimore Eye Survey.
    Katz J; Tielsch JM; Quigley HA; Javitt J; Witt K; Sommer A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Nov; 34(12):3271-7. PubMed ID: 8225862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Time changes of contrast thresholds during automatic perimetry.
    Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1977 Aug; 55(4):696-708. PubMed ID: 578374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The perimetry of the blind spot. A comparison of kinetic and static, computerized stratgies].
    Gramer E; Pröll M; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1979; 179(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 548856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A feasible development of computerized perimetry.
    Krakau CE
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1981 Aug; 59(4):485-94. PubMed ID: 7315206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The usefulness of frequency doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma screening in health-check program].
    Kusaba K; Kawanami M; Ban Y
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Sep; 108(9):554-9. PubMed ID: 15506489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma.
    Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 8489447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Structure-Function Relationship between Flicker-Defined Form Perimetry and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Suspects.
    Reznicek L; Muth D; Vogel M; Hirneiß C
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Mar; 42(3):418-423. PubMed ID: 27419859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Peripheral visual field testing in glaucoma by automated kinetic perimetry with the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Ballon BJ; Echelman DA; Shields MB; Ollie AR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Dec; 110(12):1730-2. PubMed ID: 1463413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage.
    Soliman MA; de Jong LA; Ismaeil AA; van den Berg TJ; de Smet MD
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):444-54. PubMed ID: 11874745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.