These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7332012)
21. Act amending the Adoption Arrangements Act, 27 November 1989. Germany, Federal Republic of Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():47-8. PubMed ID: 12344436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. R.R. v. M.H. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester North East Rep Second Ser; 1998 Jan; 689():790-7. PubMed ID: 12041242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Artificial insemination and surrogate motherhood--a nursery full of unresolved questions. Harris LE Willamette Law Rev; 1981; 17(4):913-52. PubMed ID: 11658334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation. Lorio KV LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Developing a concept of the modern "family": a proposed Uniform Surrogate Parenthood Act. Mandler JJ Georgetown Law J; 1985 Jun; 73(5):1283-329. PubMed ID: 11651810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Act of 13 May 1989. United States. Washington Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():54, 357-8. PubMed ID: 12344465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Legal evaluation of heterologous insemination in the GRD]. Keune HG; Rother J; Hagen H Zentralbl Gynakol; 1976; 98(24):1479-83. PubMed ID: 1014999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Death without dignity for commercial surrogacy: the case of Baby M. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(2):21-4. PubMed ID: 3391765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Surrogate motherhood: a womb in livery. Hirsh HL Leg Med; 1986; ():165-98. PubMed ID: 3312889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Opinion of 19 April 1989. United States. Oregon. Attorney General Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():54. PubMed ID: 12344461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Draft ABA Model Surrogacy Act. American Bar Association. Section of Family Law, Adoption Committee, and Ad Hoc Surrogacy Committee Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):123-43. PubMed ID: 11659040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Commercial conceptions: a breeding ground for surrogacy. O'Brien S North Carol Law Rev; 1986 Nov; 65(1):127-53. PubMed ID: 11658797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In defense of surrogate parenting: a critical analysis of the recent Kentucky experience. Phillips JW; Phillips SD KY Law J; 1980-1981; 69(4):877-931. PubMed ID: 11658606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Baby M: catalyst for family law reform? Wadlington WJ J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():1-20. PubMed ID: 11645619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Determination of legal parentage in egg donation, embryo transplantation, and gestational surrogacy arrangements. Goodwin A Fam Law Q; 1992; 26(3):275-91. PubMed ID: 11659602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Surrogate motherhood, psychiatric screening and informed consent, baby selling, and public policy. Parker PJ Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 6713101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Act No. 199, 27 June 1988. United States. Michigan Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():60, 386-7. PubMed ID: 12289631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Doe v. Attorney General. Michigan. Court of Appeals Mich Appeals Rep Mich Court Appeals; 1981 May; 106():169-74. PubMed ID: 12041107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]