77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7332260)
1. [Mechanical or biological prostheses in valvular substitutes (author's transl)].
Menasché P; Bercot M; Piwnica A
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1981 Dec; 30(7):501-6. PubMed ID: 7332260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Sub-dural hematoma, complication of anti-coagulants for valvular mechanical protheses. Role of heterografts (author's transl)].
Barra JA; Kretz JG; Grondin P
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1979; 28(3):163-5. PubMed ID: 507720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical experience with valvular bioprosthesis (author's transl)].
Shi MX
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1981 Nov; 19(11):641-4. PubMed ID: 7341134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Anticoagulation therapy in patients with valvular substitutes--survey of clotting factors and platelet aggregation for anticoagulation (author's transl)].
Matsumoto H; Takayama T; Matsunaga H; Furuta N; Yoshitake T; Saigusa M
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Jul; 29(7):1164-71. PubMed ID: 7299205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient outcome after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical or biological prosthesis: weighing lifetime anticoagulant-related event risk against reoperation risk.
van Geldorp MW; Eric Jamieson WR; Kappetein AP; Ye J; Fradet GJ; Eijkemans MJ; Grunkemeier GL; Bogers AJ; Takkenberg JJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Apr; 137(4):881-6, 886e1-5. PubMed ID: 19327512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The long term (15 years) evolution after valvular replacement with mechanical prosthesis or bioprosthesis between the age of 60 and 70 years].
Hanania G; Michel PL; Montély JM; Warembourg H; Nardi O; Leguerrier A; Agnino A; Despins P; Legault B; Petit H; Bouraindeloup M;
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2004 Jan; 97(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15002704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Normal echographic appearance of the bioprostheses in the mitral position (author's transl)].
Carette G; Genet F; Houdas Y
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1980 Mar; 29(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 7377729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Valvular prostheses and their follow-up].
Hanania G
Rev Prat; 2000 Oct; 50(15):1684-8. PubMed ID: 11116610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Caprili L; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Surgical experience with infective endocarditis (author's transl)].
Bando T; Watanabe Y; Yokoi K; Iida S; Shiotani K; Fukatani G; Iwa T
Kyobu Geka; 1981; 34(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 7463893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Mid-term results of stentless bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement. Experience in a series of 97 patients].
Hubaut JJ; Baron O; Abi Rached N; al Habash O; Despins P; Duveau D; Michaud JL
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2001 Apr; 94(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 11387932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Valve replacement surgery in end-stage renal failure: mechanical prostheses versus bioprostheses.
Chan V; Jamieson WR; Fleisher AG; Denmark D; Chan F; Germann E
Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Mar; 81(3):857-62. PubMed ID: 16488684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biological or mechanical prostheses in tricuspid position? A meta-analysis of intra-institutional results.
Rizzoli G; Vendramin I; Nesseris G; Bottio T; Guglielmi C; Schiavon L
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 May; 77(5):1607-14. PubMed ID: 15111151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Should the tricuspid valve be replaced with a mechanical or biological valve?
Kunadian B; Vijayalakshmi K; Balasubramanian S; Dunning J
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2007 Aug; 6(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 17669933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation.
Puvimanasinghe JP; Takkenberg JJ; Edwards MB; Eijkemans MJ; Steyerberg EW; Van Herwerden LA; Taylor KM; Grunkemeier GL; Habbema JD; Bogers AJ
Heart; 2004 Oct; 90(10):1172-8. PubMed ID: 15367517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of functional parameters of mechanical and biological valve prostheses].
De Gaetano G; Barberis L; Dottori V; Parodi E; Passerone GC; Lijoi A; Kandil H; Gnecco G; Badano L; Venere G
Minerva Cardioangiol; 1993 Sep; 41(9):365-70. PubMed ID: 8259231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses assessed by composites of valve-related complications to 15 years after mitral valve replacement.
Jamieson WR; von Lipinski O; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Ling H; Fradet GJ; Chan F; Germann E
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 129(6):1301-8. PubMed ID: 15942570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the type of prosthesis influence early left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement? Assessment with magnetic resonance imaging.
Sensky PR; Loubani M; Keal RP; Samani NJ; Sosnowski AW; Galiñanes M
Am Heart J; 2003 Oct; 146(4):E13. PubMed ID: 14564336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
