These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7334093)

  • 1. Measurement accuracy of proximal femoral geometry using biplanar radiography.
    Burr DB; Cook LT; Martin NL; Asher M
    J Pediatr Orthop; 1981; 1(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 7334093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple biplanar method of measuring femoral anteversion and neck-shaft angle.
    Ogata K; Goldsand EM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1979 Sep; 61(6A):846-51. PubMed ID: 479231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of femoral neck-shaft and antetorsion angles.
    Haspl M; Bilic R
    Int Orthop; 1996; 20(6):363-6. PubMed ID: 9049765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of in situ neck-shaft angle and shortening measurements of the anatomically reduced, varus malreduced and shortened proximal femur: can we believe what we see on the postoperative films?
    Marmor M; Nystuen C; Ehemer N; McClellan RT; Matityahu A
    Injury; 2012 Jun; 43(6):846-9. PubMed ID: 22040694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of femoral rotation on the projected femoral neck-shaft angle.
    Kay RM; Jaki KA; Skaggs DL
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2000; 20(6):736-9. PubMed ID: 11097245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Roentgenologic determination of the actual femoral neck-shaft and antetorsion angle. 2: Alternatives to the Rippstein and Müller procedure].
    Brückl R; Grunert S; Rosemeyer B
    Radiologe; 1986 Jun; 26(6):305-9. PubMed ID: 3749502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Rippstein and Müller roentgenologic determination of the actual femoral neck-shaft and antetorsion angle. 1: Correction of the conversion table and study of the effects of positioning errors].
    Grunert S; Brückl R; Rosemeyer B
    Radiologe; 1986 Jun; 26(6):293-304. PubMed ID: 3749501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Modified Ogata-Goldsand Technique for Simplified Intraoperative Measurement of Femoral Version.
    Morris WZ; Henry H; Liu RW; Streit JJ; Grant RE; Cooperman DR
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2015 Sep; 35(6):593-9. PubMed ID: 25379819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the Dunlap/Rippstein method for determination of femoral neck angles.
    Reikerås O; Høiseth A; Reigstad A
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1985; 26(2):177-9. PubMed ID: 3993421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defining the medial-lateral axis of the femur: Medical imaging, conventional and functional calibration methods lead to differences in hip rotation kinematics for children with torsional deformities.
    Passmore E; Graham HK; Sangeux M
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 69():156-163. PubMed ID: 29395228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty.
    Lecerf G; Fessy MH; Philippot R; Massin P; Giraud F; Flecher X; Girard J; Mertl P; Marchetti E; Stindel E
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):210-9. PubMed ID: 19423418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A generalization of Chevrot's method for determining anteversion and cervico-diaphyseal angles.
    Vanhoutte JJ; Raeside DE
    Radiology; 1978 Jul; 128(1):251-2. PubMed ID: 663217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A practical method for the determination of the angle of antetorsion and neck-shaft angle of the femur].
    König G
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1972 Feb; 110(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 4260055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Femoral anteversion assessment: Comparison of physical examination, gait analysis, and EOS biplanar radiography.
    Westberry DE; Wack LI; Davis RB; Hardin JW
    Gait Posture; 2018 May; 62():285-290. PubMed ID: 29605796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphometric evaluation of proximal femur in patients with unilateral total hip prosthesis.
    Iyem C; Güvençer M; Karatosun V; Unver B
    Clin Anat; 2014 Apr; 27(3):478-88. PubMed ID: 23650122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Determination of the antetorsional angle at the femur with axial computer tomography].
    Grote R; Elgeti H; Saure D
    Rontgenblatter; 1980 Jan; 33(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 7355256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Femoral and tibial torsion measurement in children and adolescents: comparison of 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiography and low-dose CT.
    Rosskopf AB; Ramseier LE; Sutter R; Pfirrmann CW; Buck FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W285-91. PubMed ID: 24555627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic Anatomy of the Neck-Shaft Angle of Femur in Nepalese People: Correlation with its Clinical Implication.
    Shrestha R; Gupta HK; Hamal RR; Pandit R
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2018; 16(62):124-128. PubMed ID: 30636752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomical analysis and preoperative planning of correctional osteotomies: slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).
    Kordelle J; Mamisch C; Kikinis R; Seibel R; Richolt JA
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2000; 9(3-4):269-76. PubMed ID: 20156024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy and Reliability of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With True Anatomic Femoral Version.
    Beebe MJ; Wylie JD; Bodine BG; Kapron AL; Maak TG; Mei-Dan O; Aoki SK
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2017 Jun; 37(4):e265-e270. PubMed ID: 28244927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.