These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 733456)

  • 1. Genetic screening in newborns: voluntary or compulsory?
    Kopelman L
    Perspect Biol Med; 1978; 22(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 733456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Newborn screening for sickle cell disease and other hemoglobinopathies: overview of legal issues.
    Andrews LB
    Pediatrics; 1989 May; 83(5 part 2):886-90. PubMed ID: 11651962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic testing, access to genetic data and discrimination: conceptual legislative models.
    Brown B
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1573-92. PubMed ID: 11657048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical ethics. A tough line on genetic screening.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1993 Nov; 262(5136):984-5. PubMed ID: 8235637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Which ills to bear?: reevaluating the "threat" of modern genetics.
    Capron AM
    Emory Law J; 1990; 39(3):665-96. PubMed ID: 11653905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The constitutionality of mandatory genetic screening statutes.
    Adelman CS
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1981; 31(4):897-948. PubMed ID: 11652405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of informed parental consent on mothers' knowledge of newborn screening.
    Holtzman NA; Faden R; Chwalow AJ; Horn SD
    Pediatrics; 1983 Dec; 72(6):807-12. PubMed ID: 6685863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic tests creating a deluge of dilemmas.
    Zoler ML
    Med World News; 1986 Sep; 27(18):34-9, 42, 46-52. PubMed ID: 10278681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening for genetic traits and diseases.
    McCormack MK
    Am Fam Physician; 1981 Oct; 24(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 6792891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contesting consent: the challenge to compulsory neonatal screening for PKU.
    Paul D
    Perspect Biol Med; 1999; 42(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 10085559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Newborn genetic screening: ethical and social considerations for the nineties.
    Laberge CM; Knoppers BM
    J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 11651052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandatory legislation for the screening of newborns for PKU in the United States.
    Fischer M
    Ment Retard; 1971 Oct; 9(5):25. PubMed ID: 5164113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Birthright or life sentence: controlling the threat of genetic testing.
    Nobles K
    South Calif Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):2081-128. PubMed ID: 11659655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandatory PKU screening: the other side of the looking glass.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Public Health; 1982 Dec; 72(12):1401-3. PubMed ID: 7137439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mandatory HIV testing in newborns: not yet, maybe never.
    Davis DS
    J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(2):191-2. PubMed ID: 8889895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. There's another side to genetic screening.
    Reilly P
    Prism; 1976 Jan; 3(12):55-7. PubMed ID: 11663024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ethics of mandatory HIV testing in newborns.
    Berger JT; Rosner F; Farnsworth P
    J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 8790702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Newborn screening for genetic disorders.
    Fernhoff PM
    Pediatr Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 56(3):505-13, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 19501689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mandatory non-anonymous testing of newborns for HIV: should it ever be allowed?
    Sternlight JR
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 27(2):373-91. PubMed ID: 11654699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proxy consent and a national DNA databank: an unethical and discriminatory combination.
    Baumann TK
    Iowa Law Rev; 2001 Jan; 86(2):667-701. PubMed ID: 16184651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.