These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7336181)

  • 1. Haemodynamic evaluation of the convexo-concave Björk-Shiley prosthesis in patients with narrow aortic annulus.
    Aberg B; Holmgren A
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981; 15(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7336181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fourteen years' experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis.
    Sethia B; Turner MA; Lewis S; Rodger RA; Bain WH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Mar; 91(3):350-61. PubMed ID: 3951241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Björk-Shiley aortic prosthesis: Flow characteristics of the present model vs. the convexo-concave model.
    Yoganathan AP; Reamer HH; Corcoran WH; Harrison EC
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7375880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical failure of the Björk-Shiley valve. Incidence, clinical presentation, and management.
    Lindblom D; Björk VO; Semb BK
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Nov; 92(5):894-907. PubMed ID: 3773546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between the in vitro flow dynamics of the standard and the convexo-concave Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prostheses.
    Aberg B; Henze A
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979; 13(3):177-89. PubMed ID: 542821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical treatment of combined aortic and mitral valvular disease. A clinical, haemodynamic and experimental evaluation of the standard and convexo-concave models of the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis.
    Aberg B
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Suppl; 1980; Suppl 25():1-60. PubMed ID: 6933689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thirty-year results after implantation of the Björk-Shiley Convexo-Concave Heart valve prosthesis.
    Gunn JM; Malmberg M; Vähäsilta T; Lahti AI; Kuttila KT
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Feb; 97(2):552-6. PubMed ID: 24206963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prophylactic replacement of Björk-Shiley convexo-concave valves at risk of strut fracture. Björk-Shiley Study Group.
    Kallewaard M; Algra A; Defauw J; van der Graaf Y
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1998 Mar; 115(3):577-81; discussion 591-2. PubMed ID: 9535445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical performance of Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valves: a perspective on outlet strut fractures in the 60 degrees and 70 degrees convexo-concave disc models.
    Scully HE; Damle A; Goldman BS; Tong C; Azuma J; Mickleborough LL; Schwartz L; Baird RJ
    Can J Cardiol; 1988 Oct; 4(7):386-92. PubMed ID: 3228767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Aortic valve replacement with Medtronic Hall valve (#21) using technique of enlargement of aortic annulus].
    Sato S; Kagisaki K; Shiono H; Taniguchi M; Oyama T; Hayakawa M; Nakaoka K; Ihara K; Takao T; Morimoto T
    Kyobu Geka; 1992 Mar; 45(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 1552680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Björk-Shiley heart valve prosthesis. Flow characteristics of the new 70 degrees model.
    Stevenson DM; Yoganathan AP; Franch RH
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982; 16(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 7071540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Which manufacturing characteristics are predictors of outlet strut fracture in large sixty-degree Björk-Shiley convexo-concave mitral valves? The Björk-Shiley Study Group.
    Kallewaard M; Algra A; Defauw J; van der Graaf Y
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Apr; 117(4):766-75. PubMed ID: 10096973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Central haemodynamics at rest and during exercise before and after aortic valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve in patients with isolated aortic stenosis.
    Björk VO; Henze A; Holmgren A
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1973; 7(2):111-30. PubMed ID: 4749616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Central haemodynamics at rest and during exercise before and after combined aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis.
    Aberg B; Jonasson R
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980; 14(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 7375888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
    Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outlet strut fracture of a 23-mm Björk-Shiley 70 degrees convexo-concave aortic valve.
    Abad C
    Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Aug; 1(4):445-6. PubMed ID: 8076078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aortic valve replacement in patients over 70 years.
    Bergdahl L; Björk VO; Jonasson R
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981; 15(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 7336183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early results after combined aortic and mitral valve replacement with the convexo-concave Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
    Aberg B
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981; 15(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7336182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Doppler evaluation of the monostrut and older convexo-concave Björk-Shiley mitral prosthetic valve.
    Radhakrishnan S; Dev V; Saxena A; Bahl VK; Venugopal P; Shrivastava S
    Int J Cardiol; 1989 Sep; 24(3):355-8. PubMed ID: 2788623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal orientation of the 60 degrees and the 70 degrees Björk-Shiley tilting disc valves.
    Björk VO
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982; 16(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 7156920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.