These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 733736)
1. OSHA and equal employment opportunity laws for women. Trebilcock AM Prev Med; 1978 Sep; 7(3):372-84. PubMed ID: 733736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear fetal protection employment policy. Michel SE Occup Health Saf; 1990 Jul; 59(7):40-1. PubMed ID: 2388739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Gender, race + geography = jeopardy: marginalized women, human rights and HIV in the United States. Fried ST; Kelly B Womens Health Issues; 2011 Nov; 21(6 Suppl):S243-9. PubMed ID: 22055674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited. Smith PA Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Employment law--Title VII--Eighth Circuit holds that benefits plans excluding all contraceptives do not discriminate based on sex.--In re Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, 479 F.3d 936 (8th Cir. 2007), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, No. 06-1706 (8th Cir. May 23, 2007). Harv Law Rev; 2008 Mar; 121(5):1447-54. PubMed ID: 18441613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How federal discrimination laws affect health/welfare and pension benefit plans. Weiss FK Empl Benefits J; 1981 Mar; 6(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 10249983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes. Gallagher A St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Women in the workplace, the issues. Falck FY Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Mar; 41(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 7395723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The pregnant worker: who bears the burden? Bunch PL; McFarlane DR; Dowben C Women Health; 1979; 4(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 532181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women in the workplace: a legal perspective. Stillman NG J Occup Med; 1978 Sep; 20(9):605-9. PubMed ID: 702217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Health risks and equal opportunity. Johnson DG Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):25-6. PubMed ID: 7461957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Webster, vagueness and the First Amendment. Bopp J; Coleson RE Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):217-22. PubMed ID: 2603865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Compelling pregnancy at death's door. Taylor KA Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Maternity leave: rights, rules and regulations. Freedman J J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 1992; 47(3):85-6. PubMed ID: 1624672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Contraception or incarceration: what's wrong with this picture? Callahan J Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995-1996 Winter; 7(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 16086509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Equal Rights Amendment: a matter of simple justice. Fields KL Kans Nurse; 1981 Oct; 56(10):14-5. PubMed ID: 6914401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]