These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7338251)
1. Left ventricular function before and following double valve replacement by Björk-Shiley prostheses. Schwarz F; Sesto M; Schlepper M; Walter P; Kübler W Eur Heart J; 1981 Dec; 2(6):479-86. PubMed ID: 7338251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Late results of aortic valve replacement with Bjork Shiley prostheses: a comparison of standard aortic valve prosthesis with reversed mitral valve prosthesis implanted in aortic position. Kaul TK; Mercer JL Int J Artif Organs; 1989 Nov; 12(11):728-32. PubMed ID: 2599673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Effect of prosthetic heart valve replacement on the natural course of isolated mitral and aortic as well as multivalvular diseases. Clinical results in 783 patients up to 8 years following implantation of the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis]. Horstkotte D; Loogen F; Kleikamp G; Schulte HD; Trampisch HJ; Bircks W Z Kardiol; 1983 Sep; 72(9):494-503. PubMed ID: 6636932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses. Oxenham H; Bloomfield P; Wheatley DJ; Lee RJ; Cunningham J; Prescott RJ; Miller HC Heart; 2003 Jul; 89(7):715-21. PubMed ID: 12807838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A surgical case report of combined valvular disease which led to the functional disturbance of Björk-Shiley aortic valve due to a large amount of left ventricular thrombus in the early postoperative period and to the sudden death of patient]. Ando M; Kawazoe K; Takahara Y; Kosakai Y; Ohara K; Kito Y; Naito Y; Fujita T; Manabe H Kyobu Geka; 1983 Apr; 36(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 6865146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Panel discussion: Evaluation of cardiac function for valve replacement]. J Cardiol Suppl; 1989; 20():5-8. PubMed ID: 2605006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Four years' experience of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting-disc prosthesis. Larmi TK; Kärkölä P; Kairaluoma MI; Takkunen J Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1976; 65(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 962274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982). Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular filling characteristics after mitral valve replacement with the St Jude medical prosthesis. St John Sutton M; Roudaut R; Oldershaw P; Bricaud H Br Heart J; 1981 Apr; 45(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 7225250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement]. Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Budde T; Haerten K; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):251-61. PubMed ID: 6880335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve replacements]. Mühlberger V; Schistek R; Hopferwieser T; Schwaiger A; Scharfetter H; Knapp E Z Kardiol; 1986 Jun; 75(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 3751218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Bj"ork-Shiley heart vales at the Bern University Hospital. Long-term follow-up of 12 to 23 years after mitral and aortic valve replacement in 503 patients]. Stuber T; Kaufmann U; Kipfer B; Meier B Praxis (Bern 1994); 1999 Feb; 88(9):355-63. PubMed ID: 10191683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of long-term clinical follow-up after aortic or mitral valve replacement with Björk-Shiley tilting disc prostheses or tissue valves. Mudra H; Kraus F; Wellnhofer E; Hall D; Rudolph W Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():277-81. PubMed ID: 3727700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Thrombembolic malfunction of a Björk-Shiley aortic valve prosthesis. Koops E; Püschel K Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Oct; 27(5):319-21. PubMed ID: 524335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative study of left ventricular function in double valve replacement with or without patch enlargement of aortic and mitral valve anulus]. Kitamura M; Nagase Y; Kurosawa H; Imai Y; Hashimoto A; Koyanagi H Kyobu Geka; 1984 Jun; 37(6):411-9. PubMed ID: 6471636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Strut fracture and other events after valve replacement with the 60 degree convexoconcave Björk-Shiley prosthesis. Gonzalez-Lavin L; McGrath LB; Grunkemeier G; Fernandez J; Lewis B; Quinlan W Circulation; 1987 Sep; 76(3 Pt 2):III137-40. PubMed ID: 3621537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experience with the Björk-Shiley prosthetic valve. Meyer JM; Grundill W; Kleynhans P; Erasmus FR; Ungerer MJ; Myburgh JA; Lowings JF S Afr Med J; 1974 Dec; 48(59):2444-8. PubMed ID: 4453923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Exercise capacity after heart valve replacement]. Horstkotte D; Niehues R; Schulte HD; Strauer BE Z Kardiol; 1994; 83 Suppl 3():111-20. PubMed ID: 7941657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Selection of valve prosthesis, reoperation and late result--surgical technique of reoperation with Björk-Shiley prosthesis]. Sunamori M; Suzuki A Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 90(9):1517-20. PubMed ID: 2586456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]