These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7339468)

  • 1. Determining transthoracic impedance, delivered energy, and peak current during defibrillation episodes.
    Jones VC; Charbonnier FM; Long P
    Med Instrum; 1981; 15(6):380-2. PubMed ID: 7339468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance.
    Zhang Y; Rhee B; Davies LR; Zimmerman MB; Snyder D; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2006 Feb; 68(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16325983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pediatric defibrillation: current flow is improved by using "adult" electrode paddles.
    Atkins DL; Kerber RE
    Pediatrics; 1994 Jul; 94(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 8008545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impedance to transthoracic direct current discharge: a model for testing interface material.
    Ewy GA; Taren D
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 634191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design for a constant peak current defibrillator.
    Machin JW; Brownhill J; Furness A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jul; 37(7):723-30. PubMed ID: 2394461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective randomized comparison of defibrillation efficacy of truncated pulses and damped sine wave pulses in humans.
    Bardy GH; Zaghi H; Gartman D; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PK; Dolack GL; Johnson G; Troutman C
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Sep; 5(9):725-30. PubMed ID: 7827711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The prediction of the impedance of the thorax to defibrillating current.
    Geddes LA; Tacker WA; Schoenlein W; Minton M; Grubbs S; Wilcox P
    Med Instrum; 1976; 10(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 1272091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transthoracic impedance to direct current discharge: effect of repeated countershocks.
    Dahl CF; Ewy GA; Ewy MD; Thomas ED
    Med Instrum; 1976; 10(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 1272089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the operating internal resistance, inductance, and capacitance of intact damped sine wave defibrillators.
    Babbs CF; Whistler SJ
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 634188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current and energy in external cardiac defibrillation.
    Watson AB; Ellis MS
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1994 Dec; 17(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 7872902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disposable defibrillator electrodes.
    Ewy GA; Horan WJ; Ewy MD
    Heart Lung; 1977; 6(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 583893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in transthoracic impedance during sequential biphasic defibrillation.
    Deakin CD; Ambler JJ; Shaw S
    Resuscitation; 2008 Aug; 78(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 18486297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transthoracic impedance study with large self-adhesive electrodes in two conventional positions for defibrillation.
    Krasteva V; Matveev M; Mudrov N; Prokopova R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Oct; 27(10):1009-22. PubMed ID: 16951460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated external defibrillators: design considerations.
    Kroll MW; Brewer JE
    New Horiz; 1997 May; 5(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 9153042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Tuned" defibrillation waveforms outperform 50/50% tilt defibrillation waveforms: a randomized multi-center study.
    Natarajan S; Henthorn R; Burroughs J; Esberg D; Zweibel S; Ross T; Kroll M; Gianola D; Oza A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S139-42. PubMed ID: 17302691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Initial experience with a microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator.
    Dalzell GW; Cunningham SR; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Br Heart J; 1989 Jun; 61(6):502-5. PubMed ID: 2757862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of five different defibrillators using recommended energy protocols.
    Zelinka M; Buić D; Zelinka I
    Resuscitation; 2007 Sep; 74(3):500-7. PubMed ID: 17466431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation, resuscitation or survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a non-escalating biphasic waveform defibrillator.
    White RD; Blackwell TH; Russell JK; Snyder DE; Jorgenson DB
    Resuscitation; 2005 Jan; 64(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 15629557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intracardiac voltage gradients during transthoracic defibrillation: implications for postshock myocardial injury.
    Niemann JT; Walker RG; Rosborough JP
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Feb; 12(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15692128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of ventilation phase on transthoracic impedance and defibrillation effectiveness.
    Ewy GA; Hellman DA; McClung S; Taren D
    Crit Care Med; 1980 Mar; 8(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 7363632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.