These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7339468)

  • 21. Pediatric defibrillation: importance of paddle size in determining transthoracic impedance.
    Atkins DL; Sirna S; Kieso R; Charbonnier F; Kerber RE
    Pediatrics; 1988 Dec; 82(6):914-8. PubMed ID: 3186384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Transthoracic electrical impedance during external defibrillation: comparison of measured and modelled waveforms.
    Al Hatib F; Trendafilova E; Daskalov I
    Physiol Meas; 2000 Feb; 21(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 10720010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Control of high common mode voltage during transthoracic defibrillation.
    Deale OC; Ng KT; Kim EJ; Lerman BB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Dec; 42(12):1208-11. PubMed ID: 8550063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison between two defibrillation waveforms.
    Kostov J; Mudrov T; Dotsinsky I; Mudrov N
    J Med Eng Technol; 2010; 34(7-8):429-36. PubMed ID: 20858038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Automatic adjustment of biphasic pulse duration in transthoracic defibrillation.
    Krasteva V; Iliev I; Cansell A; Daskalov I
    J Med Eng Technol; 2000; 24(5):210-4. PubMed ID: 11204244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automated impedance-based energy adjustment for defibrillation: experimental studies.
    Kerber RE; McPherson D; Charbonnier F; Kieso R; Hite P
    Circulation; 1985 Jan; 71(1):136-40. PubMed ID: 3964715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A percutaneous catheter-based system for the measurement of potential gradients applicable to the study of transthoracic defibrillation.
    Rosborough JP; Deno DC; Walker RG; Niemann JT
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 17338711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimization of transthoracic ventricular defibrillation-biphasic and triphasic shocks, waveform rounding, and synchronized shock delivery.
    Kidwai BJ; McIntyre A; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    J Electrocardiol; 2002 Jul; 35(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 12122614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transmyocardial impedance during single and multiple internal ventricular defibrillation shocks.
    Peters W; Solingen S; Kobayashi Y; Scharf R; Mandel WJ; Gang ES
    Am J Physiol; 1994 Aug; 267(2 Pt 2):H684-93. PubMed ID: 8067424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Individual effect of components of defibrillation waveform on the contractile function and intracellular calcium dynamics of cardiomyocytes.
    Tsai MS; Tang W; Sun S; Wang H; Freeman G; Chen WJ; Weil MH
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Aug; 37(8):2394-401. PubMed ID: 19531953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical evaluation of defibrillation efficacy with a new single-capacitor biphasic waveform in patients undergoing implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
    Brugada J; Herse B; Sandsted B; Michel U; Schubert BD; Hahn SJ
    Europace; 2001 Oct; 3(4):278-84. PubMed ID: 11678385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of cardiac parameters using electrical impedance plethysmography.
    Corciovă C; Turnea M; Matei D; Andritoi D
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2012; 116(3):927-32. PubMed ID: 23272554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Relationship between canine transthoracic impedance and defibrillation threshold. Evidence for current-based defibrillation.
    Lerman BB; Halperin HR; Tsitlik JE; Brin K; Clark CW; Deale OC
    J Clin Invest; 1987 Sep; 80(3):797-803. PubMed ID: 3624489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Noninvasive ventilatory volume monitor using the electrical impedance method--elimination of impedance changes associated with cardiac oscillations].
    Itoh A; Kikuchi N; Ishida A; Okazaki N; Kira S
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1982 Sep; 20(5):314-20. PubMed ID: 7182614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Calibrated current divider network for precision current delivery during high-voltage transthoracic defibrillation.
    Deale OC; Ng KT; Lerman BB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Nov; 52(11):1970-3. PubMed ID: 16285402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Defibrillation probability and impedance change between shocks during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Walker RG; Koster RW; Sun C; Moffat G; Barger J; Dodson PP; Chapman FW
    Resuscitation; 2009 Jul; 80(7):773-7. PubMed ID: 19423211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automatic adjustment of chopping-modulated defibrillation pulses to patient transthoracic resistance.
    Krasteva V; Cansell A; Daskalov I
    J Med Eng Technol; 2003; 27(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 12623607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Patient-dependent current dosing for semi-automatic external defibrillators (AED).
    Schönegg M; Schöchlin J; Bolz A
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 1():302-5. PubMed ID: 12451846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Transthoracic electrical impedance method for measurement of pulmonary edema in vivo (author's transl)].
    Ishibe Y
    Masui; 1978 Dec; 27(13):1559-67. PubMed ID: 731847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automated precision current delivery: an alternative method for cardiac defibrillation.
    Zimmerman D; Farkhani F; Wesley RC
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Apr; 17(4 Pt 1):595-602. PubMed ID: 7516543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.