These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7339572)
41. Accurate vocal compensation for sound intensity loss with increasing distance in natural environments. Zahorik P; Kelly JW J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):EL143-50. PubMed ID: 18189448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The sound strength parameter G and its importance in evaluating and planning the acoustics of halls for music. Beranek L J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3020-6. PubMed ID: 21568405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Human echolocation: pitch versus loudness information. Schenkman BN; Nilsson ME Perception; 2011; 40(7):840-52. PubMed ID: 22128556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Brighter noise: sensory enhancement of perceived loudness by concurrent visual stimulation. Odgaard EC; Arieh Y; Marks LE Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 4(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15460919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings. Park HK; Bradley JS J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Increasing- and decreasing-loudness aftereffects: asymmetrical functions for absolute rate of sound level change in adapting stimulus. Reinhardt-Rutland AH J Gen Psychol; 1995 Apr; 122(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 7790848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Feasibility of an objective electrophysiological loudness scaling: a kernel-based novelty detection approach. Mariam M; Delb W; Schick B; Strauss DJ Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jul; 55(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 22592125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The neural correlates of subjectively perceived and passively matched loudness perception in auditory phantom perception. De Ridder D; Congedo M; Vanneste S Brain Behav; 2015 May; 5(5):e00331. PubMed ID: 25874164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Perceptually plausible sounds facilitate visually induced self-motion perception (vection). Seno T; Hasuo E; Ito H; Nakajima Y Perception; 2012; 41(5):577-93. PubMed ID: 23025161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A mathematical exploration of the mystery of loudness adaptation. Norwich KH Bull Math Biol; 2010 Feb; 72(2):298-313. PubMed ID: 19727963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Insertion gain repeatability versus loudspeaker location: you want me to put my loudspeaker where? Killion MC; Revit LJ Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5 Suppl):68S-73S. PubMed ID: 3678653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation. Versümer S; Steffens J; Weinzierl S J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 May; 153(5):2956. PubMed ID: 37212512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Asymmetric visual capture of virtual sound sources in the distance dimension. Zahorik P Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():958577. PubMed ID: 36117637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The influence of onset sound level of test stimulus on reported magnitude of changing-loudness aftereffects. Reinhardt-Rutland AH J Gen Psychol; 1995 Jul; 122(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 7650523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The objective-subjective assessment of noise: young adults can estimate loudness of events and lifestyle noise. Beach EF; Williams W; Gilliver M Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 22380619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Perceived size and perceived distance of targets viewed from between the legs: evidence for proprioceptive theory. Higashiyama A; Adachi K Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(23):3961-76. PubMed ID: 16979687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. An introduction to induced loudness reduction. Epstein M J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):EL74. PubMed ID: 17927311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]