These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7343000)

  • 1. Principal components and varimax-rotated components in event-related potential research: some remarks on their interpretation.
    Rösler F; Manzey D
    Biol Psychol; 1981 Dec; 13():3-26. PubMed ID: 7343000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PCA and varimax rotation: some comments on Rösler and Manzey.
    Wastell DG
    Biol Psychol; 1981 Dec; 13():27-9. PubMed ID: 7342996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: a note on misallocation of variance.
    Möcks J; Verleger R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Sep; 65(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 2427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: simulation studies demonstrate misallocation of variance across components.
    Wood CC; McCarthy G
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 Jun; 59(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 6203715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 117(2):348-68. PubMed ID: 16356767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PCAVR: a portable laboratory program for performing varimax-rotated principal components analysis of event-related potentials.
    Pritchard WS
    Brain Res Bull; 1984 Sep; 13(3):465-73. PubMed ID: 6548655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Doubts on the adequacy of the principal component varimax analysis for the identification of event-related brain potential components: a commentary on Glaser and Ruchkin, and Donchin and Heffley.
    Collet W
    Biol Psychol; 1989 Apr; 28(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 2775805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neuronal generator patterns at scalp elicited by lateralized aversive pictures reveal consecutive stages of motivated attention.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE; Abraham KS; Alschuler DM; Alvarenga JE; Skipper J; Warner V; Bruder GE; Weissman MM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():337-350. PubMed ID: 27263509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EEG frequency PCA in EEG-ERP dynamics.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Psychophysiology; 2018 May; 55(5):e13042. PubMed ID: 29226962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlling for experimental effects in event-related potentials by means of principal component rotation.
    Beauducel A; Leue A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 239():139-47. PubMed ID: 25455342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recovering Wood and McCarthy's ERP-prototypes by means of ERP-specific procrustes-rotation.
    Beauducel A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Feb; 295():20-36. PubMed ID: 29175590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating two-step PCA of ERP data with Geomin, Infomax, Oblimin, Promax, and Varimax rotations.
    Dien J
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Jan; 47(1):170-83. PubMed ID: 19761521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of principal components computed with principal factor analysis on the basis of averaged and single-trial ERPs using the Fischer-Roppert procedure.
    Dormann WU; Mundlos S; Haschke R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1987 Jan; 4(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 3558060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations.
    Dien J; Beal DJ; Berg P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 116(8):1808-25. PubMed ID: 15996897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing PCA methodology for ERP component identification and measurement: theoretical rationale and empirical evaluation.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Dec; 114(12):2307-25. PubMed ID: 14652090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the correlated nature of evoked brain activity: biophysical and statistical considerations.
    Wastell DG
    Biol Psychol; 1981 Dec; 13():51-69. PubMed ID: 6282348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applying principal components analysis to event-related potentials: a tutorial.
    Dien J
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2012; 37(6):497-517. PubMed ID: 22889342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus-to-matching-stimulus interval influences N1, P2, and P3b in an equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Steiner GZ; Barry RJ; Gonsalvez CJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25034341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Principal component analysis of ERP differences related to the meaning of an ambiguous word.
    Brown WS; Marsh JT; Smith JC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1979 Jun; 46(6):709-14. PubMed ID: 87317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequential processing in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task with variable interstimulus interval.
    Borchard JP; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug; 97(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26024616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.