These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7343663)

  • 1. The retrieval of scaled English consonants.
    Black JW; Wickens DD; Jancosek E
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1981 Nov; 10(6):537-53. PubMed ID: 7343663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention.
    Lozito JP; Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):986-98. PubMed ID: 17128598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Secondary memory and very rapid forgetting.
    Sebrechts MM; Marsh RL; Seamon JG
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Nov; 17(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 2811666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors modulating the effect of divided attention during retrieval of words.
    Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jul; 30(5):731-44. PubMed ID: 12219890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term memory errors for spoken syllables are affected by the linguistic structure of the syllables.
    Treiman R; Danis C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Jan; 14(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 2963893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of the syllable in the processing of spoken English: evidence from a nonword comparison task.
    Bruck M; Treiman R; Caravolas M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):469-79. PubMed ID: 7790828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate memory in the orally trained deaf: effects of 'lipreadability' in the recall of written syllables.
    Campbell R; Wright H
    Br J Psychol; 1989 Aug; 80 ( Pt 3)():299-312. PubMed ID: 2790390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects in span tasks.
    Caplan D; Rochon E; Waters GS
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 Aug; 45(2):177-92. PubMed ID: 1410554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.
    Meltzer JA; Rose NS; Deschamps T; Leigh RC; Panamsky L; Silberberg A; Madani N; Links KA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 26374330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When meaning is useless.
    Benetello A; Cecchetto C; Papagno C
    Memory; 2015; 23(7):1001-12. PubMed ID: 25121998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modality effects in delayed free recall and recognition: visual is better than auditory.
    Penney CG
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1989 Aug; 41(3):455-70. PubMed ID: 2798920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonotactic influences on short-term memory.
    Gathercole SE; Frankish CR; Pickering SJ; Peaker S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 9949710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conjunction errors, recollection-based rejections, and forgetting in a continuous recognition task.
    Jones TC; Atchley P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 16478341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Levels of processing with free and cued recall and unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy.
    Lespinet-Najib V; N'Kaoua B; Sauzéon H; Bresson C; Rougier A; Claverie B
    Brain Lang; 2004 Apr; 89(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 15010240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Naming multisyllabic words.
    Jared D; Seidenberg MS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 2137526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concreteness effects in different tasks: implications for models of short-term memory.
    Romani C; McAlpine S; Martin RC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):292-323. PubMed ID: 17853203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orthographic and phonetic coding in developmental dyslexia.
    Rack JP
    Br J Psychol; 1985 Aug; 76 ( Pt 3)():325-40. PubMed ID: 4041704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can intentional forgetting reduce false memory? Effects of list-level and item-level forgetting.
    Lee YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 17475195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A special link between rhyming skill and the use of orthographic analogies by beginning readers.
    Goswami U
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1990 Jan; 31(2):301-11. PubMed ID: 2312655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.
    Battacchi MW; Pelamatti GM; Umiltà C
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 2266866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.