These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7343789)

  • 1. Perception of speech rate as a function of vocal intensity and frequency.
    Feldstein S; Bond RN
    Lang Speech; 1981 Dec; 24(Pt 4):387-94. PubMed ID: 7343789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of articulation on the perceived loudness of the projected voice.
    Myers BR; Finnegan EM
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e9-15. PubMed ID: 25770375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vocal Performance of Group Fitness Instructors Before and After Instruction: Changes in Acoustic Measures and Self-Ratings.
    Dallaston K; Rumbach AF
    J Voice; 2016 Jan; 30(1):127.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25795364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contribution of phonation type to the perception of vocal emotions in German: an articulatory synthesis study.
    Birkholz P; Martin L; Willmes K; Kröger BJ; Neuschaefer-Rube C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1503-12. PubMed ID: 25786961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of analogy instruction for pitch variation on perceptual ratings of other speech parameters.
    Tse AC; Wong AW; Ma EP; Whitehill TL; Masters RS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):906-12. PubMed ID: 23811473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalization.
    Chen Z; Liu P; Jones JA; Huang D; Liu H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):EL355-60. PubMed ID: 21218857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of simultaneous perturbations of voice pitch and loudness feedback on voice F0 and amplitude control.
    Larson CR; Sun J; Hain TC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):2862-72. PubMed ID: 17550185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Native language affects rhythmic grouping of speech.
    Bhatara A; Boll-Avetisyan N; Unger A; Nazzi T; Höhle B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3828-43. PubMed ID: 24180792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissimilarity and the classification of male singing voices.
    Erickson ML
    J Voice; 2008 May; 22(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 17134873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustical correlates of the perception of speech rate: an experimental investigation.
    Bond RN; Feldstein S
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1982 Nov; 11(6):539-57. PubMed ID: 7161726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loudness and pitch of Kunqu opera.
    Dong L; Sundberg J; Kong J
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 24070593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vocal flexibility and prosodic strategies in a professional impersonator.
    Revis J; De Looze C; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):524.e23-31. PubMed ID: 23453593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of vocal variation on listener recall.
    Rockwell P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1996 May; 25(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 8648593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linguistic aspects of magnitude-estimation scaling of instrumental music, instrumental music with vocal accompaniment, and spoken lyrics.
    Fucci D; Petrosino L; Hallowell B; Banks M; Zaums K
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 2):1387-90. PubMed ID: 8823903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Voice outcome in patients treated for laryngeal cancer: efficacy of voice rehabilitation.
    Tuomi L; Björkner E; Finizia C
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 23769005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of voice amplification on occupational vocal dose in elementary school teachers.
    Gaskill CS; O'Brien SG; Tinter SR
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):667.e19-27. PubMed ID: 22521533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of linguistic content on the Lombard effect.
    Patel R; Schell KW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Feb; 51(1):209-20. PubMed ID: 18230867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of resonance tubes on glottal contact quotient with and without task instruction: a comparison of trained and untrained voices.
    Gaskill CS; Quinney DM
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):e79-93. PubMed ID: 21550779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonatory function after prolonged voice use in Brazilian woman.
    Pellicani AD; Ricz HM; Ricz LN
    Codas; 2015; 27(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 26398264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.