These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7344514)

  • 21. Comparison of carcinogenic and in vivo genotoxic potency estimates.
    Sanner T; Dybing E
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2005 Feb; 96(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 15679476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. DNA adducts and the mechanism of carcinogenesis and cytotoxicity of methylating agents of environmental and clinical significance.
    Kyrtopoulos SA; Anderson LM; Chhabra SK; Souliotis VL; Pletsa V; Valavanis C; Georgiadis P
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1997; 21(5):391-405. PubMed ID: 9307842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC working paper 2/3: carcinogens and carcinogenesis enhancers.
    Clayson DB
    Mutat Res; 1981 Mar; 86(2):217-29. PubMed ID: 7266570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Structural characteristics of compounds that can be activated to chemically reactive metabolites: use for a prediction of a carcinogenic potential.
    Lutz WK
    Arch Toxicol Suppl; 1984; 7():194-207. PubMed ID: 6595983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Carcinogen binding to DNA.
    Straub KM; Burlingame AL
    Biomed Mass Spectrom; 1981 Sep; 8(9):431-5. PubMed ID: 7306680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantitative evaluation of DNA binding data for risk estimation and for classification of direct and indirect carcinogens.
    Lutz WK
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 1986; 112(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 3095332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genotoxicity of 1,3-butadiene and its epoxy intermediates.
    Walker VE; Walker DM; Meng Q; McDonald JD; Scott BR; Seilkop SK; Claffey DJ; Upton PB; Powley MW; Swenberg JA; Henderson RF;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Aug; (144):3-79. PubMed ID: 20017413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative predictivity of carcinogenicity for four short-term parameters, evaluated in rat liver: alkaline DNA fragmentation, autoradiographic repair, DNA adducts, preneoplastic nodules.
    Parodi S; Taningher M; Santi L
    Folia Biol (Praha); 1984; 30 Spec No():145-54. PubMed ID: 6724053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How chemicals may induce cancer.
    Sarasin A; Meunier-Rotival M
    Biomedicine; 1976 Nov; 24(5):306-16. PubMed ID: 793643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screening assays for carcinogenic agents and mixtures: an appraisal based on data in the IARC Monograph series.
    Bartsch H; Malaveille C
    IARC Sci Publ; 1990; (104):65-74. PubMed ID: 2228144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction of carcinogenicity from two versus four sex-species groups in the carcinogenic potency database.
    Gold LS; Slone TH
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1993 May; 39(1):143-57. PubMed ID: 8492327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. DNA modification by chemical carcinogens.
    Jeffrey AM
    Pharmacol Ther; 1985; 28(2):237-72. PubMed ID: 3936066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Detection of genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens in Xpc(-/-)p53(+/-) mice.
    Melis JP; Speksnijder EN; Kuiper RV; Salvatori DC; Schaap MM; Maas S; Robinson J; Verhoef A; van Benthem J; Luijten M; van Steeg H
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Jan; 266(2):289-97. PubMed ID: 23153559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
    Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal.
    O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Constable A; Dybing E; Müller DJ; Schlatter J; Slob W; Tueting W; van Benthem J; Williams GM; Wolfreys A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1613-35. PubMed ID: 16887251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Low doses and thresholds in genotoxicity: from theories to experiments.
    Zito R
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2001 Sep; 20(3):315-25. PubMed ID: 11718209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The search for relevant short term bioassays for chemical carcinogens: the tribulation of a modern Sisyphus.
    Stich HF; Lam P; Lo LW; Koropatnick DJ; San RH
    Can J Genet Cytol; 1975 Dec; 17(4):471-91. PubMed ID: 812599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 1,3-butadiene: cancer, mutations, and adducts. Part III: In vivo mutation of the endogenous hprt genes of mice and rats by 1,3-butadiene and its metabolites.
    Walker VE; Meng Q
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2000 Mar; (92):89-139; discussion 141-9. PubMed ID: 10925840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Endogenous genotoxic agents and processes as a basis of spontaneous carcinogenesis.
    Lutz WK
    Mutat Res; 1990 May; 238(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 2188125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.