These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7344702)
21. [Image quality parameters of film-screen systems]. Hoeschen D Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jun; 40(6):193-9. PubMed ID: 3616429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Energy and angular dependence of x-ray absorption and its effect on radiographic response in screen--film systems. Chan HP; Doi K Phys Med Biol; 1983 May; 28(5):565-79. PubMed ID: 6867113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Wiener spectral effects of spatial correlation between the sites of characteristic x-ray emission and reabsorption in radiographic screen-film systems. Metz CE; Vyborny CJ Phys Med Biol; 1983 May; 28(5):547-64. PubMed ID: 6867112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiographic mottle: a comprehensive theory. Barnes GT Med Phys; 1982; 9(5):656-67. PubMed ID: 7155067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Film/screen speed. Weatherburn G Med Phys; 2006 Dec; 33(12):4772. PubMed ID: 17278831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The energy-dependent behavior of noise Wiener spectra in their low-frequency limits: comparison with simple theory. Vyborny CJ; Loo LN; Doi K Radiology; 1982 Aug; 144(3):619-22. PubMed ID: 7100480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [New realities in the modern X-ray technology]. Blinov NN; Mazurov AI Med Tekh; 2003; (5):3-6. PubMed ID: 14603840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Current control of image quality in a radiology laboratory]. Wójtowicz J Pol Przegl Radiol; 1983; 47(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 6377274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors. Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [New intensifying films in roentgen diagnosis. A clinically oriented evaluation of rare earth films in comparison to conventional films]. Beyer HK; Schulze B Rontgenpraxis; 1981 Sep; 34(9):387-94. PubMed ID: 7302710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Flat-screen detector systems in skeletal radiology]. Grampp S; Czerny C; Krestan C; Henk C; Heiner L; Imhof H Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 12764584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector. Strotzer M; Völk M; Wild T; von Landenberg P; Feuerbach S Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):512-5. PubMed ID: 10796933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Conventional Film-Screen Principles of Exposure Selection in the Digital Age. Steward A; Tarollo M; Mandarano G; Lombardi C Radiol Technol; 2018 May; 89(5):488-494. PubMed ID: 29793908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Fundamentals of digital mammography: physics, technology and practical considerations. Smith A Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):18-24, 26-31; quiz 32-4. PubMed ID: 14603590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography. Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]