These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7344702)
41. [Optimization of the thoracic radiograph. Experimental and clinical study on the use of various film/screen combinations using rare earths]. Bergonzini R; Gallini R; Giugni U; Robecchi D; Amato M Radiol Med; 1986 May; 72(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 3715076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. An analysis of dose efficiency in image intensified fluoroscopic examinations. Bernstein H; Muntz EP Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 7322044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Analog image and digital image. Campioni P; Meduri A; Tartaglione T; Mazzone MA Rays; 1992; 17(3):416-32. PubMed ID: 1480786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [X-ray film evaluation with a new equidensitometric film (author's transl)]. Müllenberg W Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1974 Oct; 121(4):512-7. PubMed ID: 4373351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. [Digital roentgenographic systems based on photostimulated screens and their comparison with roentgenographic screen-film sets]. Gorelik FG; Stankevich NE Med Tekh; 2006; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 17133936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Point/Counterpoint. A major advantage of digital imaging for general radiography is the potential for reduced patient dose so film/screen systems should be phased out as unnecessarily hazardous. Vano E; Faulkner K; Orton CG Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1529-31. PubMed ID: 16872058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. A novel technique to suppress grid line artifacts. Gauntt DM; Barnes GT Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1654-67. PubMed ID: 16872073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Detector for dual-energy digital radiography. Barnes GT; Sones RA; Tesic MM; Morgan DR; Sanders JN Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):537-40. PubMed ID: 4011921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Studies of x-ray energy absorption and quantum noise properties of x-ray screens by use of Monte Carlo simulation. Chan HP; Doi K Med Phys; 1984; 11(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 6700552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Digital detectors in mammography. A technological overview. Dhaenens F JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 10859905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Selection of optimal screen-film combination for use in the neonatal intensive care unit. Smith WL; Franken EA; Frangi SM; Windsor C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Dec; 139(6):1051-3. PubMed ID: 6756100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [The spatial resolution of the digital storage phosphor system. The monitor and film compared]. Nessi R; Castellana L; Paruccini N; Blanc M; Uslenghi CM Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 7501837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]