These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7345056)

  • 1. Loudness growth of musically complex stimuli.
    Marshall L
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 7345056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnitude estimation scaling of the loudness of a wide range of auditory stimuli.
    Fucci D; Petrosino L; McColl D; Wyatt D; Wilcox C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Dec; 85(3 Pt 1):1059-66. PubMed ID: 9399319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Loudness scaling for narrow band noise and speech signal].
    Prosser S; Rosignoli M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1998 Dec; 18(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 10388150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pure-Tone-Spondee Threshold Relationships in Functional Hearing Loss: A Test of Loudness Contribution.
    Schlauch RS; Han HJ; Yu TJ; Carney E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 27973669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting descending binaural loudness balances as a manifestation of adaptation.
    Young IM; Lowry LD; Menduke H
    J Aud Res; 1986 Jan; 26(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 3610992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Loudness perception of low tones undergoing partial masking by higher tones in orchestral music in concert halls.
    Nishihara N; Hidaka T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):799-803. PubMed ID: 22894202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Loudness of simple and complex stimuli in electric hearing.
    Zeng FG; Shannon RV
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():235-8. PubMed ID: 7668651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Loudness adaptation measured by the simultaneous dichotic loudness balance technique differs between genders.
    D'Alessandro LM; Norwich KH
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 19027058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Duration of increment, magnitude estimation adaptation and a proposed loudness function.
    Weiler EM; Cobb F
    J Aud Res; 1982 Oct; 22(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 7188204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1219-30. PubMed ID: 19739735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
    Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of pitch, loudness, and timbre on the perception of instrument dynamics.
    Fabiani M; Friberg A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL193-9. PubMed ID: 21974491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Loudness change in response to dynamic acoustic intensity.
    Olsen KN; Stevens CJ; Tardieu J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1631-44. PubMed ID: 20822303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monaural and binaural adaptation in sequence: SDLB analogue?
    Weiler EM; Cobb F; Sandman D; Pederson L
    J Aud Res; 1985 Jul; 25(3):149-59. PubMed ID: 3842839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Most comfortable loudness for pure tones and speech in the presence of masking noise.
    Richards AM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 1186159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnitude judgments of loudness change for discrete, dynamic, and hybrid stimuli.
    Pastore RE; Flint J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):886-907. PubMed ID: 21264709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.