These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7347738)

  • 1. Brain stem evoked response (wave V) latency to filtered pulses.
    Leppler JG; Greenberg HJ
    J Aud Res; 1980 Jul; 20(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 7347738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog: early latency components.
    Sims MH; Moore RE
    Am J Vet Res; 1984 Oct; 45(10):2019-27. PubMed ID: 6497099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Onset-offset effects of the human brainstem auditory-evoked response.
    Elfner LF; Barnes AR
    J Aud Res; 1983 Apr; 23(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 6679545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of the effect of auditory fatigue on the human ear based on the measurement of brain stem auditory potentials (ABR). II. Relation of temporary auditory threshold shift and changes in the latency of wave V].
    Janczewski G; Kochanek K; Dawidowicz J; Dobrzyński P; Checiński P
    Med Pr; 1988; 39(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 3226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain stem auditory-evoked response of the nonanesthetized dog.
    Marshall AE
    Am J Vet Res; 1985 Apr; 46(4):966-73. PubMed ID: 4014849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the acoustic reflex threshold at 3 kc/s for setting optimal click-presentation level in ABR testing.
    Kasden SD
    J Aud Res; 1981 Jan; 21(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 7349866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog: middle latency components.
    Sims MH; Moore RE
    Am J Vet Res; 1984 Oct; 45(10):2028-33. PubMed ID: 6497100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain stem evoked response audiometry in neonates.
    Mandal AK; Mehra YN; Narang A; Raghunathan M; Walia BN
    Indian Pediatr; 1989 Jun; 26(6):566-70. PubMed ID: 2583808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brainstem evoked response (BER) audiometry at various stimulus presentation rates.
    Weber BA; Fujikawa SM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 914673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brain stem auditory-evoked response in the nonanesthetized horse and pony.
    Marshall AE
    Am J Vet Res; 1985 Jul; 46(7):1445-50. PubMed ID: 4026024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tone burst auditory brain stem response latency estimates of cochlear travel time in Meniere's disease, cochlear hearing loss, and normal ears.
    Murray JG; Cohn ES; Harker LA; Gorga MP
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):854-9. PubMed ID: 9831168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustically dependent latency shifts of BSER (wave V) in man.
    Klein AJ; Teas DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jun; 63(6):1887-95. PubMed ID: 681621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain-stem auditory impairment during the neonatal period in term infants after asphyxia: dynamic changes in brain-stem auditory evoked response to clicks of different rates.
    Jiang ZD; Yin R; Shao XM; Wilkinson AR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1605-15. PubMed ID: 15203061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory brain stem response testing in anesthetized horses.
    Rolf SL; Reed SM; Melnick W; Andrews FM
    Am J Vet Res; 1987 Jun; 48(6):910-4. PubMed ID: 3605806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The indication for brain stem evoked response and the effect of click rate and stimulus intensity on the latencies of the auditory evoked potentials (author's transl)].
    Baschek V; Steinert W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Oct; 59(10):690-7. PubMed ID: 7453423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High click stimulus repetition rate in the auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients with normal MRI. Does it improve diagnosis?
    Santos MA; Munhoz MS; Peixoto MA; Silva CS
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15605430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Electrophysiologic evaluation of the frequency selectivity by conversion of concurrent waves with the aid of a 40 Hz middle latency response].
    Coene P; Lurquin P
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1988; 42(5):587-97. PubMed ID: 3242347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Long-latency auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implants].
    Mata JJ; Jiménez JM; Pérez J; Postigo A; Roldán B
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999; 50(6):432-4. PubMed ID: 10502692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in neonatology: the method and results in a group of normal newborns].
    Pasanisi E; Bacciu S; Fava G; Dallatomasina M; Bacciu A; Negri M; Piazza F; Montali S
    Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense; 1996; 67(5-6):191-5. PubMed ID: 10021703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical interpretation of brainstem evoked response audiometry abnormalities in cochlear pathology.
    Lajtman Z; Borcić V; Markov D; Popović-Kovacić J; Vincelj J; Krpan D
    Acta Med Croatica; 1999; 53(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 10705632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.