These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7347990)
1. Dose reduction in the low-energy X-ray diagnostics of extremities. Zaránd P; Pálvölgyi R; Péntek Z; Polgár I Acta Biochim Biophys Acad Sci Hung; 1981; 16(3-4):219-22. PubMed ID: 7347990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography]. Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Film-screen mammography x-ray tube anodes: molybdenum versus tungsten. Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Rothschild P Med Phys; 1989; 16(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 2716707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose efficiency of screen-film systems used in pediatric radiography. Cohen G; Wagner LK; McDaniel DL; Robinson LH Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 6729110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uroradiographic dosimetry using a rare-earth screen-film system. Segal AJ; Maillie HD; Lemkin JA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Nov; 139(5):923-6. PubMed ID: 6981976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative study of screen-film combinations used in conventional radiography]. Malchair F; Longtain F; Gordenne W J Belge Radiol; 1988; 71(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 3215896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of x-radiation doses between conventional and rare earth panoramic radiographic techniques. Skoczylas LJ; Preece JW; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Waggener RG Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 2594329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduction of body doses in rotational panoramic radiography by means of reduced beam width in combination with rare earth intensifying screens. Aagaard A; Sewerin I Scand J Dent Res; 1986 Dec; 94(6):530-5. PubMed ID: 3468601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Determination of absorbed doses of radiation during lateral cephalometric radiography]. Patsakas AJ; Donta CN; Tsiklakis KD Hell Period Stomat Gnathopathoprosopike Cheir; 1989 Jun; 4(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 2640655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results. Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New mammography screen/film combinations: imaging characteristics and radiation dose. Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Zheutlin J; Gornbein JA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Apr; 154(4):713-9. PubMed ID: 2107663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An economic evaluation of the use of rare earth screens to reduce the radiation dose from diagnostic X-ray procedures in Israel. Ginsberg GM; Schlesinger T; Ben-Shlomo A; Kushilevsky A; Margaliot M; Oren M; Finkleman M; Friedman A; Handlesman M; Lev B Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):406-12. PubMed ID: 9659134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]