These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7347990)

  • 21. Patient radiation dose management in dental facilities according to the X-ray focal distance and the image receptor type.
    Gonzalez L; Moro J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):282-4. PubMed ID: 17586855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Entrance surface and ovarian doses in hysterosalpingography.
    Fife IA; Wilson DJ; Lewis CA
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Sep; 67(801):860-3. PubMed ID: 7953227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Plain radiography with a rare-earth screen: comparison with calcium tungstate screen.
    Picus D; McAlister WH; Smith E; Rodewald S; Jost RG; Evens RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Dec; 143(6):1335-8. PubMed ID: 6333800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical comparison of high-speed rare-earth screen and par-speed screen for diagnostic efficacy and radiation dosage.
    Robinson T; Becker JA; Olson AP
    Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):214-6. PubMed ID: 6821592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative means of dose reduction in dental radiography.
    Rohlin M; White SC
    Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Jun; 2():1-9. PubMed ID: 1520917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dose reduction in dental radiography.
    Horner K; Hirschmann PN
    J Dent; 1990 Aug; 18(4):171-84. PubMed ID: 2212199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A phantom approach to find the optimal technical parameters for plain chest radiography.
    Vassileva J
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):648-53. PubMed ID: 15326041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Reduction of radiation dosage in mammography by using film intensifying foil systems in Poland].
    Iwaszkiewicz K; Bończyk J
    Pol Tyg Lek; 1991 Apr 22-29; 46(17-18):346-8. PubMed ID: 1669071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiation absorbed doses in cephalography.
    Eliasson S; Julin P; Richter S; Stenström B
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 6585997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiation dose to neonates on a Special Care Baby Unit.
    Faulkner K; Barry JL; Smalley P
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Mar; 62(735):230-3. PubMed ID: 2702379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rare-earth and calcium tungstate intensifying screens, a comparative study of relative speed, radiation doses and resolving power.
    de Carvalho A; Jørgensen J
    Rofo; 1978 Mar; 128(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 147838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Dose requirements for projection techniques in x-ray diagnosis].
    Hagemann G
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 May; 2(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 1610926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography.
    Wu X; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
    Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 2006265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Possibilities of dose reduction in extramammographic xeroradiography (author's transl)].
    John V; Ewen K; Bringewald B
    Strahlentherapie; 1978 Oct; 154(10):734-7. PubMed ID: 694964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Reduction of radiation dosage by the use of newer reinforced rare earth films].
    Hofmann T
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1987; 19(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 3474210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Imaging characteristics of new screen/film systems for cephalometric radiography.
    Fatouros PP; Gibbs SJ; Skubic SE; Rao GU
    Angle Orthod; 1984 Jan; 54(1):36-54. PubMed ID: 6584050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.