These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7348703)

  • 1. Fixation of porous titanium implants in cortical bone enhanced by electrical stimulation.
    Colella SM; Miller AG; Stang RG; Stoebe TG; Spengler DM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Jan; 15(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 7348703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interface mechanics of porous titanium implants.
    Clemow AJ; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Koeneman J; Anderson J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Jan; 15(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 7348706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of skeletal attachment to LTI pyrolytic carbon, porous titanium, and carbon-coated porous titanium implants.
    Anderson RC; Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Haddad RJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984; (182):242-57. PubMed ID: 6692619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of disodium etidronate (EHDP) on bone ingrowth in a porous material.
    Rivero DP; Skipor AK; Singh M; Urban RM; Galante JO
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Feb; (215):279-86. PubMed ID: 3100123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A double-blind study on the effects of a capacitively coupled electrical field on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced canine total hip prostheses.
    Schutzer SF; Jasty M; Bragdon CR; Harrigan TP; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Nov; (260):297-304. PubMed ID: 2225636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone ingrowth into weight-bearing porous fiber titanium implants. Mechanical and biochemical correlations.
    Barth E; Ronningen H; Solheim LF; Saethren B
    J Orthop Res; 1986; 4(3):356-61. PubMed ID: 3734941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calcium phosphate-coated porous titanium implants for enhanced skeletal fixation.
    Rivero DP; Fox J; Skipor AK; Urban RM; Galante JO
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Mar; 22(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 3360814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of fibrin sealant on the fixation of porous titanium and pyrolytic carbon implants.
    Hetherington VJ; Park JB; Park SH; Carnett JA; Patterson BA; Bratkiewicz L; Kessler DA
    J Foot Surg; 1989; 28(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 2472435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of hydroxyapatite impregnation on skeletal bonding of porous coated implants.
    Ducheyne P; Hench LL; Kagan A; Martens M; Bursens A; Mulier JC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 May; 14(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 7364787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrical stimulation of bone growth into porous A12O3.
    Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Cleveland TW
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1976 Mar; 10(2):231-47. PubMed ID: 1254614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of porous surface configuration on the tensile strength of fixation of implants by bone ingrowth.
    Bobyn JD; Pilliar RM; Cameron HU; Weatherly GC; Kent GM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980 Jun; (149):291-8. PubMed ID: 7408314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Piezoelectric ceramic implants: in vivo results.
    Park JB; Kelly BJ; Kenner GH; von Recum AF; Grether MF; Coffeen WW
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Jan; 15(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 7348700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancement of bone ingrowth by the use of bone matrix as a biologic cement.
    McLaughlin RE; Reger SI; Bolander M; Eschenroeder HC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Mar; (183):255-61. PubMed ID: 6697593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of bone ingrowth into cobalt chrome sphere and titanium fiber mesh porous coated cementless canine acetabular components.
    Jasty M; Bragdon CR; Haire T; Mulroy RD; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):639-44. PubMed ID: 8314816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhanced bone ingrowth and fixation strength with hydroxyapatite-coated porous implants.
    Cook SD; Thomas KA; Dalton JE; Kay JF
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1991 Oct; 2(4):268-79. PubMed ID: 10171176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical and histological fixation of hydroxylapatite-coated pyrolytic carbon and titanium alloy implants: a report of short-term results.
    Hetherington VJ; Lord CE; Brown SA
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 8589509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mediation of bone ingrowth in porous hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes.
    Hing KA; Best SM; Tanner KE; Bonfield W; Revell PA
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jan; 68(1):187-200. PubMed ID: 14661264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of cis-platinum on bone ingrowth into porous fiber titanium. Mechanical and biochemical correlations.
    Barth E; Roenningen H; Solheim LF; Saethren B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1986; 1(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 3465700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Growth factor stimulation of bone healing. Effects on osteoblasts, osteomies, and implants fixation.
    Lind M
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1998 Oct; 283():2-37. PubMed ID: 9856074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of pulsing electromagnetic field on bone ingrowth into a porous coated implant.
    Ijiri K; Matsunaga S; Fukuyama K; Maeda S; Sakou T; Kitano M; Senba I
    Anticancer Res; 1996; 16(5A):2853-6. PubMed ID: 8917397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.