These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7348811)
21. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication? Dlugacz HA Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Michigan disability-rights law applies to prison inmates. AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Aug; 14(14):10-1. PubMed ID: 11366999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Right of a defendant to refuse antipsychotic medication during a criminal trial. Williams KG Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Sep; 50(4):1937-9. PubMed ID: 11660177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Internal regulations of penitentiaries]. Salvi F Rass Penititenziaria Crim; 1981; 3(3-4):499-503. PubMed ID: 7348810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Prisons. ACLU blasts jail for failing to give inmate HIV medication. AIDS Policy Law; 2004 Mar; 19(5):9. PubMed ID: 15074289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Forced administration of sex-drive reducing medications to sex offenders: treatment or punishment? Miller RD Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998; 4(1-2):175-99. PubMed ID: 12484316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada. Gutierrez L Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Civil commitment and the criminal insanity plea in Israeli law. Toib JA Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(4):308-18. PubMed ID: 18374417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Basics of civil and criminal law of psychiatric coercive measures in France]. Gravier B; Völlm B Psychiatr Prax; 2007 Mar; 34(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 17390265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Allowing new technology to erode constitutional protections: a Fourth Amendment challenge to non-consensual DNA testing of prisoners. Love SH Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(5):1617-60. PubMed ID: 11653232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Attitudes towards prisoners, as reported by prison inmates, prison employees and college students. Kjelsberg E; Skoglund TH; Rustad AB BMC Public Health; 2007 May; 7():71. PubMed ID: 17480213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A review of the Burger Court: Part I. Parry J Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Prison legal matters: is prison neglect creating super HIV? Rodrigues T Newsline People AIDS Coalit N Y; 1998; ():34-5. PubMed ID: 11367506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The constitutionality of the use of the Norplant contraceptive device as a condition of probation. Burke M Hastings Constit Law Q; 1992; 20(1):207-46. PubMed ID: 11652186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Sources of law]. Gutierrez Luna M Neurologia; 2004 Dec; 19 Suppl 4():3-6. PubMed ID: 15719282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Norplant prescription: birth control, women control, or crime control? Arthur SL UCLA Law Rev; 1992 Oct; 40(1):1-101. PubMed ID: 11652185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. When terminating parental rights is not enough: a new look at compulsory sterilization. Blum ET Georgia Law Rev; 1994; 28(4):977-1017. PubMed ID: 11653343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. From moral theory to penal attitudes and back: a theoretically integrated modeling approach. de Keijser JW; van der Leeden R; Jackson JL Behav Sci Law; 2002; 20(4):317-35. PubMed ID: 12210971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]