177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7349821)
1. Advantages and limitations of physical examination and mammography in breast cancer screening.
Feig SA; Schwartz GF
Cancer Detect Prev; 1981; 4(1-4):553-63. PubMed ID: 7349821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of clinically occult and mammographically occult breast tumors.
Feig SA; Shaber GS; Patchefsky A; Schwartz GF; Edeiken J; Libshitz HI; Nerlinger R; Curley RF; Wallace JD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Mar; 128(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 190908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors.
Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Wray LA; Helvie MA
Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 14695385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic factors of breast neoplasms detected on screening by mammography and physical examination.
Feig SA; Schwartz GF; Nerlinger R; Edeiken J
Radiology; 1979 Dec; 133(3 Pt 1):577-82. PubMed ID: 504635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design.
Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; Peeters PH; Loo CE; Mann RM; de Jong MD; Bisschops RH; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MB; Pijnappel RM; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van den Bosch MA; Monninkhof EM; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH
Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 26110667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity of mammography and physical examination of the breast for detecting breast cancer.
Hicks MJ; Davis JR; Layton JM; Present AJ
JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(19):2080-3. PubMed ID: 490787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics.
Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):191-9. PubMed ID: 9530316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast imaging.
Kopans DB; Meyer JE; Sadowsky N
N Engl J Med; 1984 Apr; 310(15):960-7. PubMed ID: 6366562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early diagnosis of breast cancer: experience in a consultant breast clinic.
Mahoney LJ; Bird BL; Cooke GM; Ball DG
Can Med Assoc J; 1977 May; 116(10):1129-31. PubMed ID: 861862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Thermography, mammography, and clinical examination in breast cancer screening. Review of 16,000 studies.
Feig SA; Shaber GS; Schwartz GF; Patchefsky A; Libshitz HI; Edeiken J; Nerlinger R; Curley RF; Wallace JD
Radiology; 1977 Jan; 122(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 830320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancers in women 35 years of age and younger: mammographic findings.
Shaw de Paredes E; Marsteller LP; Eden BV
Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):117-9. PubMed ID: 2399309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival.
Porter GJ; Evans AJ; Cornford EJ; Burrell HC; James JJ; Lee AH; Chakrabarti J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):676-83. PubMed ID: 17312053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of mammographic density on the diagnostic accuracy of tumor size assessment and association with breast cancer tumor characteristics.
Fasching PA; Heusinger K; Loehberg CR; Wenkel E; Lux MP; Schrauder M; Koscheck T; Bautz W; Schulz-Wendtland R; Beckmann MW; Bani MR
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 60(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 17030108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Usefulness of the "targeted" clinical examination in the screening of breast tumors].
Guidi R; Marcer C; Rossini M
Radiol Med; 1991 Mar; 81(3):273-5. PubMed ID: 2014332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use and abuse of mammography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer.
Mahoney L; Csima A
Can J Surg; 1983 May; 26(3):262-3, 265. PubMed ID: 6850440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional mammography, physical examination, thermography and xeroradiography in the detection of breast cancer.
Egan RL; Goldstein GT; McSweeney MM
Cancer; 1977 May; 39(5):1984-92. PubMed ID: 870164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A positive view of xeromammography.
Alberty R; Cordova G
Am Surg; 1978 Aug; 44(8):527-9. PubMed ID: 707908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
