These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7350898)
1. Comparison of the pattern and diffuse-light visual evoked responses in definite multiple sclerosis. Wilson WB; Keyser RB Arch Neurol; 1980 Jan; 37(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 7350898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Critical frequency of photic driving in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. A comparison to pattern evoked responses. Cohen SN; Syndulko K; Tourtellotte WW; Potvin AR Arch Neurol; 1980 Feb; 37(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 7356412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual evoked potentials (VEP) elicited by checkerboard versus foveal stimulation in multiple sclerosis. A clinical study in 235 patients. Oepen G; Brauner C; Doerr M; Thoden U Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970); 1981; 229(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 7224832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of adaptation to the stimulating pattern on the latency and wave form of visual evoked potentials. Ochs AL; Aminoff MJ Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 May; 48(5):502-8. PubMed ID: 6153958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual evoked potentials and the visuogram in multiple sclerosis. Bodis-Wollner I; Hendley CD; Mylin LH; Thornton J Ann Neurol; 1979 Jan; 5(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 426467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic validity for different components of pattern shift visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Tackmann W; Strenge H; Barth R; Sojka-Raytscheff A Eur Neurol; 1979; 18(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 488142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis: comparison of two methods for pattern reversal. Nilsson BY J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1978 Jun; 41(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 671061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Asselman P; Chadwick DW; Marsden DC Brain; 1975 Jun; 98(2):261-82. PubMed ID: 1148819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis measured by Cambridge Low Contrast Gratings: a useful clinical test? Fahy J; Glynn D; Hutchinson M J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1989 Jun; 52(6):786-7. PubMed ID: 2746273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures of interocular suppression. May JG; Harter MR; Siegfried JB Psychophysiology; 1981 Jan; 18(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 7465725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Latency of luminance and contrast evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients. Duwaer AL; Spekreijse H Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1978 Aug; 45(2):244-58. PubMed ID: 78834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of cerebral lateralization of function using EEG alpha-contingent visual stimulation II. Goodman D; Mulholland T Int J Psychophysiol; 1988 Nov; 6(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 3225202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A survey of the pattern reversal visual evoked response (PRVER) in 1428 consecutive patients referred to a clinical neurophysiology department. Robinson K; Rudge P; Small DG; Storey CE J Neurol Sci; 1984 Jun; 64(3):225-43. PubMed ID: 6470738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]