These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7352024)
21. Relation between spiral aftereffect duration and rod-and-frame test performance in early childhood. Andersson AL; Ruuth E Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Jun; 32(3):843-9. PubMed ID: 5557025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Note on development of perception of size. Masin SC Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):788-94. PubMed ID: 18229534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A depth illusion supports the model of General Object Constancy: Size and depth constancies related by a same distance-scaling factor. Qian J; Petrov Y Vision Res; 2016 Dec; 129():77-86. PubMed ID: 27810350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Visual sensitivity can scale with illusory size changes. Schindel R; Arnold DH Curr Biol; 2010 May; 20(9):841-4. PubMed ID: 20434339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Again, knowledge of common source fails to promote visual-haptic integration. Misceo GF; Jackson SV; Perdue JR Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Feb; 118(1):183-94. PubMed ID: 24724521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Letter: Visual size constancy occurs after binocular rivalry. Blake R; Fox R; Westendorf D Vision Res; 1974 Jul; 14(7):585-6. PubMed ID: 4420130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Accommodation and size-constancy of virtual objects. Kenyon RV; Phenany M; Sandin D; Defanti T Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 36(2):342-8. PubMed ID: 18066664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Perception of size of one object among many. Levinson JZ; Frome FS Science; 1979 Dec; 206(4425):1425-6. PubMed ID: 505017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Some influences of visual angle and retinal speed on measures of the spiral aftereffect. Williams MJ; Collins WE Percept Mot Skills; 1970 Feb; 30(1):215-27. PubMed ID: 5476105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Disparity scaling and the perception of frontoparallel surfaces. Rogers BJ; Bradshaw MF Perception; 1995; 24(2):155-79. PubMed ID: 7617423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. High-level adaptation aftereffects for novel objects: the role of pre-existing representations. Daelli V Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1923-7. PubMed ID: 21440561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Shifts in perception of size after adaptation to gratings. Frome FS; Levinson JZ; Danielson JT; Clavadetscher JE Science; 1979 Dec; 206(4424):1327-9. PubMed ID: 515736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The moon illusion revisited. Iavecchia JH; Iavecchia HP; Roscoe SN Aviat Space Environ Med; 1983 Jan; 54(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 6830556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Tilt aftereffect due to adaptation to natural stimuli. Dekel R; Sagi D Vision Res; 2015 Dec; 117():91-9. PubMed ID: 26550954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Depth perception in the framework of General Object Constancy. Qian J; Petrov Y J Vis; 2013 Sep; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 24023274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An effective paradigm for conditioning visual perception in human subjects. Davies P; Davies GL; Bennett S Perception; 1982; 11(6):663-9. PubMed ID: 7186617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Target size and luminance in apparent brightness of the peripheral visual field. Osaka N Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Aug; 41(1):49-50. PubMed ID: 1178432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]