These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7352085)

  • 41. [Our experience with intrauterine devices (IUD) for birth control].
    Vidal JJ; Flores F; López de Medina R; Aisa E; Villar JM
    Acta Obstet Ginecol Hisp Lusit; 1980 Feb; 28(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 7395474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive device: 5-year evaluation.
    Sellors JW
    Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Oct; 125(7):717-20. PubMed ID: 7326653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparison of two IUDs: Multiload Cu 250 and Copper T 200.
    Ladehoff P; Hansen MK; Larsen S; Sorensen T; Westergaard JG
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1983 Jan; 4(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 12264721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Failure to insert an intrauterine device.
    Chi IC; Rogers S
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1983 Jul; 4(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 12265364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Three years experience with copper T-200.
    Kanitkar SD; Tare VS; Tambay PY; Mutatkar KR
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1983 May; 80(9-10):148-9. PubMed ID: 6644055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Copper containing intrauterine devices. Clinical and social aspects].
    Beck A
    Fortschr Med; 1982 Sep; 100(33):1515-9. PubMed ID: 7129314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Copper-silver T: The classic T resuscitated].
    Jarvela S; Allonen H
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1986 Jan; 14(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 12341240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparative performance of two copper-wired IUDs (ML Cu 250 and T Cu 200: immediate postpartum and interval insertion.
    Van Der Pas MT; Delbeke L; Van Dets H
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1980 Jan; 1(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 12261715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Risks of Uterine Perforation and Expulsion Associated With Intrauterine Devices.
    Fassett MJ; Reed SD; Rothman KJ; Pisa F; Schoendorf J; Wahdan Y; Peipert JF; Gatz J; Ritchey ME; Armstrong MA; Raine-Bennett T; Postlethwaite D; Getahun D; Shi JM; Xie F; Chiu VY; Im TM; Takhar HS; Wang J; Anthony MS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Sep; 142(3):641-651. PubMed ID: 37535968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Clinical evaluation of the progesterone T intrauterine device].
    Pizarro Orchard E; Gómez Rogers C
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1980; 45(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 6765370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Nova-T 200 intrauterine contraceptive device: a 12 year study.
    Baeyertz JD; Hartfield VJ
    N Z Med J; 1997 May; 110(1043):169-71. PubMed ID: 9196502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Insertion and removal of intrauterine devices.
    Johnson BA
    Am Fam Physician; 2005 Jan; 71(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 15663031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Copper IUDs.
    Thiery M
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1983 Jul; 4(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 12265360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Random comparative study between intrauterine device Multiload Cu375 and TCu 380a inserted in the postpartum period].
    Lara Ricalde R; Menocal Tobías G; Ramos Pérez C; Velázquez Ramírez N
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2006 Jun; 74(6):306-11. PubMed ID: 16970116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Intrauterine devices in general practice: a prospective study of 300 insertions].
    Marret H; Golfier F; Vollerin F; Legoaziou MF; Raudrant D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Sep; 31(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 12379830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of clinic related factors on continuation rates of IUDs.
    Reading AE; Goldstuck ND
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1982 Jan; 3(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12264121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The intrauterine device in the present and future.
    Rivera R; Chi IC; Farr G
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 5(6):829-32. PubMed ID: 8286697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. IUDs: current perspectives.
    Hepburn S
    Curr Ther (Seaforth); 1994 Oct; 35(10):49-55. PubMed ID: 12319352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Efficacy of intrauterine device TCu380A when inserted in four different periods].
    Wu SC;
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 44(6):431-5. PubMed ID: 19953943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: a decision analysis.
    Reeves MF; Smith KJ; Creinin MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1286-94. PubMed ID: 17540799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.