These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Random-dot stereograms of real objects: observation on stereo faces and moulds. Georgeson MA Perception; 1979; 8(5):585-8. PubMed ID: 503788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning to see random-dot stereograms. O'Toole AJ; Kersten DJ Perception; 1992; 21(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 1513672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pattern and depth discrimination from random dot stereograms. Harwerth RS; Rawlings SC Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1975 Apr; 52(4):248-57. PubMed ID: 1130488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Depth inversion despite stereopsis: the appearance of random-dot stereograms on surfaces seen in reverse perspective. Yellott JI; Kaiwi JL Perception; 1979; 8(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 471677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Judgments by monkeys of apparent depth in dynamic random-dot stereograms. Crawford ML; von Noorden GK; Harwerth RS; Smith EL Behav Brain Res; 1996 Sep; 79(1-2):219-25. PubMed ID: 8883833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpolation of forms in random-dot stereograms with varying dot densities. Kobayashi I Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Dec; 77(3 Pt 2):1361-2. PubMed ID: 8170791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cerebral asymmetries in random-dot stereopsis: reversal of direction with changes in dot size. Pitblado CB Perception; 1979; 8(6):683-90. PubMed ID: 530809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Form and depth in global stereopsis. Chung CS; Berbaum K J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):258-75. PubMed ID: 6232344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Texture discrimination at the cyclopean retina. Pérez-Martínez D Perception; 1995; 24(7):771-86. PubMed ID: 8710440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhancing Motion-In-Depth Perception of Random-Dot Stereograms. Zhang D; Nourrit V; De Bougrenet de la Tocnaye JL Perception; 2018 Jul; 47(7):722-734. PubMed ID: 29914316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the apparent collapse of stereopsis in random-dot-stereograms at isoluminance. Kingdom FA; Simmons DR; Rainville S Vision Res; 1999 Jun; 39(12):2127-41. PubMed ID: 10343795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experience and latency to achieve stereopsis. MacCracken PJ; Hayes WN Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Dec; 43(3 Pt 2):1227-31. PubMed ID: 1012899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disparity-processing in Wilde's dot-row phenomenon. van der Meer HC Psychol Res; 1982; 44(2):105-17. PubMed ID: 7146237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Random dot stereograms and the limits of their detectability]. Pittke EC Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Apr; 192(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 3404945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Asymmetries and errors in perception of depth from disparity suggest a multicomponent model of disparity processing. Landers DD; Cormack LK Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):219-31. PubMed ID: 9055617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of the components of disparity in Wilde's dot-row phenomenon. van der Meer HC Psychol Res; 1982; 44(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 7146239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis. Gillam B; Chambers D; Russo T J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 May; 14(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 2967874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]