These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7355721)

  • 1. Recommended criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs.
    Royster LH; Lilley DT; Thomas WG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Jan; 41(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 7355721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of the effectiveness of two different insert types of ear protection in preventing TTS in an industrial environment.
    Royster LH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Mar; 41(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 7395724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age effect hearing levels for a white nonindustrial noise exposed population (ninep) and their use in evaluating industrial hearing conservation programs.
    Royster LH; Thomas WG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Jun; 40(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 484467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intratympanic dexamethasone for sudden sensorineural hearing loss after failure of systemic therapy.
    Haynes DS; O'Malley M; Cohen S; Watford K; Labadie RF
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Jan; 117(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 17202923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness.
    Prince MM; Colligan MJ; Stephenson CM; Bischoff BJ
    J Safety Res; 2004; 35(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 14992850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age related changes in hearing level among Thai people.
    Kaewboonchoo O; Saleekul S; Jaipukdee S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Apr; 90(4):798-804. PubMed ID: 17487137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Hearing damage as a consequence of firefighters' professional exposure to noise].
    Lalić H; Ferhatović M; Dinko J; Culinović M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2009 May; 63(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 19580230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occupational hearing loss among selected farm tractor operators employed on large multiproduction farms in Poland.
    Solecki L
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1998; 11(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 9637996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effectiveness of hearing protective devices.
    Gosztonyi RE
    J Occup Med; 1975 Sep; 17(9):569-80. PubMed ID: 1165499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standard threshold shift criteria. An investigation of the most reliable indicator of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Lane CL; Dobie RA; Crawford DR; Morgan MS
    J Occup Med; 1985 Jan; 27(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 3968596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An internet-based hearing test for simple audiometry in nonclinical settings: preliminary validation and proof of principle.
    Honeth L; Bexelius C; Eriksson M; Sandin S; Litton JE; Rosenhall U; Nyrén O; Bagger-Sjöbäck D
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jul; 31(5):708-14. PubMed ID: 20458255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing conservation programs (HCPs): the effectiveness of one company's HCP in a 12-hr work shift environment.
    Reynolds JL; Royster LH; Pearson RG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Aug; 51(8):437-46. PubMed ID: 2392973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative analysis of occupational hearing loss risk among private farmers with reference to decision-making criteria contained in the cabinet ordinances (current and previous)].
    Solecki L
    Med Pr; 2005; 56(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 16613370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
    Savell JF; Toothman EH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extended high-frequency audiometry in subjects exposed to occupational noise.
    Korres GS; Balatsouras DG; Tzagaroulakis A; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E
    B-ENT; 2008; 4(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 18949961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
    Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the audioscope in an industrial setting.
    House RA; Pasut G
    J Occup Med; 1992 May; 34(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 1593294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.