These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7355967)
21. Fetal cephalometry by ultrasound. The predictability of the expected date of delivery by biparietal diameter percentiles. Qvigstad E; Sande HA J Oslo City Hosp; 1978 Dec; 28(12):167-8. PubMed ID: 731347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Range of normality of fetal BPD (biparietal diameter) measured by means of ultrasonics]. Campogrande M; Monti R; Padula G; Todros T; Gagliardi L Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1976; 97(4):243-52. PubMed ID: 1020881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Amniotic fluid phosphatidylglycerol and real-time ultrasonic cephalometry. Strassner HT; Platt LD; Whittle M; Hill LM; Yeh SY; Manning FA; Golde SH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Nov; 135(6):804-8. PubMed ID: 495681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sonar cephalometry in twin pregnancy: discordancy of the biparietal diameter after 28 weeks' gestation. Leveno KJ; Santos-Ramos R; Duenhoelter JH; Reisch JS; Whalley PJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Nov; 138(6):615-9. PubMed ID: 7435526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biparietal diameter in the Australian aboriginal fetus. Watson DS Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Apr; 93(4):339-42. PubMed ID: 3516207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Experience with cephalometry in the determination of labor in diabetic pregnant women]. Szalay VJ; Kun L; Somogyi J Zentralbl Gynakol; 1975; 97(14):871-4. PubMed ID: 1217242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sonar cephalometry and fetal age relationship in the Nigerian women. Osefo NJ; Chukudebelu WO East Afr Med J; 1983 Feb; 60(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 6617552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Measurement of the fetal biparietal diameter with ultrasonics]. Bergsjo P; Kvile G Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1975 Oct; 95(30):1714-8. PubMed ID: 1188869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Scientific basis for standardization of fetal head measurements by ultrasound: a reproducibility study. Napolitano R; Donadono V; Ohuma EO; Knight CL; Wanyonyi SZ; Kemp B; Norris T; Papageorghiou AT Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 48(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 27158767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Comparison between biparietal diameter of the head as determined by ultrasound and fetal body weight (author's transl)]. Gubza S; Bruchác D Bratisl Lek Listy; 1977 Feb; 67(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 858077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Measurement of the biparietal diameter before and after external version of the fetus]. Peretz BA; Markovitci R; Feldman E; Zimmer EZ; Paldi E Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Nov; 79(11):725-6. PubMed ID: 6533746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Measurement of the fetal biparietal diameter by ultrasound is not an accurate method of detecting fetal growth retardation. Duff GB; Evans LJ N Z Med J; 1981 Oct; 94(694):312-4. PubMed ID: 6948199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Fetal biparietal diameter percentiles. Ultrasonic findings during normal pregnancy]. Todros T; Campogrande M Minerva Ginecol; 1976 Feb; 28(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 1256713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Ultrasonic fetal cephalometry--some improvements and future developments. Hall AJ; Fleming JE; Abdulla U Ultrasonics; 1970 Jan; 8(1):34-5. PubMed ID: 5414680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Relationship of fetal limb lengths to both biparietal diameter and gestational age. Seeds JW; Cefalo RC Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Dec; 60(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 7145264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fetal cephalometry: a comparison between antenatal ultrasonic estimation and postnatal measurements. Kurjak A; Drazancić A; Polak J; Kuvacić I; Latin V; Olajos I Acta Med Iugosl; 1974; 28(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 4447053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The feasibility of using 5D CNS software in obtaining standard fetal head measurements from volumes acquired by three-dimensional ultrasonography: comparison with two-dimensional ultrasound. Rizzo G; Aiello E; Pietrolucci ME; Arduini D J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(14):2217-22. PubMed ID: 26364724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]