These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7358910)

  • 1. Identification of synthetic /bdg/ by hearing-impaired listeners under monotic and dichotic formant presentation.
    Van de Grift Turek S; Dorman MF; Franks JR; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Mar; 67(3):1031-40. PubMed ID: 7358910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Susceptibility to intraspeech spread of masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Hannley M; Dorman MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 6886197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraspeech spread of masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2866-76. PubMed ID: 9165738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the first formant on the recognition of voiced stop consonants by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dorman MF; Lindholm JM; Hannley MT
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):377-80. PubMed ID: 2931555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.
    Mackersie CL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Release from first-formant masking in presbyacusis.
    Kaplan H; Pickett JM
    Audiology; 1984; 23(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 6721788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech.
    Ozmeral EJ; Buss E; Hall JW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154920. PubMed ID: 27144601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of dichotic/diotic versus monotic presentation on speech understanding in noise in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kaplan H; Pickett JM
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 7297784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Rankovic CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Processing of cues for stop consonant voicing by young hearing-impaired listeners.
    Johnson D; Whaley P; Dorman MF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 6716995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1666-75. PubMed ID: 2708682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency discrimination ability and stop-consonant identification in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Ochs MT; Humes LE; Ohde RN; Grantham DW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 2704188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of hearing impairment on the identification of speech that is modulated synchronously or asynchronously across frequency.
    Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):955-62. PubMed ID: 18247898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Formant transition duration and speech recognition in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Turner CW; Smith SJ; Aldridge PL; Stewart SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2822-5. PubMed ID: 9165736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of synthetic, voiced stop-consonants by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Raz I; Noffsinger D
    Audiology; 1985; 24(6):437-48. PubMed ID: 4084116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dichotic and monotic masking of CV's by CV second formants with different transition starting values.
    Porter RJ; Whittaker RG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1772-80. PubMed ID: 7372933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phoneme boundaries in normal and hearing-impaired ears.
    Walden BE; Montgomery AA; Prosek RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1101-12. PubMed ID: 3700865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech competition effects on synthetic stop-vowel perception by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gordon-Salant SM; Wightman FL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 May; 73(5):1756-65. PubMed ID: 6223058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.