106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 736079)
1. Comparative clinical assessment of corneal sensation with a new aesthesiometer.
Beuerman RW; McCulley JP
Am J Ophthalmol; 1978 Dec; 86(6):812-5. PubMed ID: 736079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the sensory function of the ocular surface: implications of use of a non-contact air jet aesthesiometer versus the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer.
Golebiowski B; Papas E; Stapleton F
Exp Eye Res; 2011 May; 92(5):408-13. PubMed ID: 21376718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of the non-contact corneal aesthesiometer and its comparison with the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer.
Murphy PJ; Lawrenson JG; Patel S; Marshall J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Nov; 18(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 10070549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical application of the Swiss Liquid Jet Aesthesiometer for corneal sensitivity measurement.
Nosch DS; Käser E; Bracher T; Joos RE
Clin Exp Optom; 2024 Jan; 107(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 37019837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of ambient humidity on the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer.
Lum E; Murphy PJ
Eye (Lond); 2018 Oct; 32(10):1644-1651. PubMed ID: 29921953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new non-contact corneal aesthesiometer (NCCA).
Murphy PJ; Patel S; Marshall J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 8762770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Corneal sensitivity in healthy, immature, and adult alpacas.
Rankin AJ; Hosking KG; Roush JK
Vet Ophthalmol; 2012 Jan; 15(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 22051098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer-determined corneal sensitivity in neonatal foals and adult horses.
Brooks DE; Clark CK; Lester GD
Vet Ophthalmol; 2000; 3(2-3):133-137. PubMed ID: 11397295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new corneal aesthesiometer.
Larson WL
Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1969 Sep; 46(9):717-20. PubMed ID: 5258734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Corneal sensation after laser epithelial keratomileusis for the correction of myopia.
Herrmann WA; Shah C; Gabler B; Winkler von Mohrenfels C; Hufendiek K; Lohmann CP
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 243(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15316794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding the stimulus of an air-jet aesthesiometer: computerised modelling and subjective interpretation.
Golebiowski B; Lim M; Papas E; Stapleton F
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 23406490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Precision, agreement and utility of a contemporary non-contact corneal aesthesiometer.
Swanevelder SK; Misra SL; Tyler EF; McGhee CN
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Nov; 103(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 31869862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corneal sensitivity in healthy bovine calves.
Tofflemire KL; Whitley EM; Dewell RD; Gould SA; Allbaugh RA; Ben-Shlomo G; O'Connor AM; Whitley RD
Vet Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 17(4):305-8. PubMed ID: 24674385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conjunctival Sensation in Scleritis.
Somkijrungroj T; Pimolrat W; Gonzales JA; Keenan JD; Margolis TP
Ocul Immunol Inflamm; 2016; 24(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 26647348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does air gas aesthesiometry generate a true mechanical stimulus for corneal sensitivity measurement?
Nosch DS; Pult H; Albon J; Purslow C; Murphy PJ
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 28922696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal Nerve Assessment by Aesthesiometry: History, Advancements, and Future Directions.
Crabtree JR; Tannir S; Tran K; Boente CS; Ali A; Borschel GH
Vision (Basel); 2024 May; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 38804355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Corneal sensation after descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Kumar RL; Koenig SB; Covert DJ
Cornea; 2010 Jan; 29(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 19907297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ocular surface sensitivity repeatability with Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer.
Chao C; Stapleton F; Badarudin E; Golebiowski B
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Feb; 92(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 25546826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of duration of corneal anesthesia induced with ophthalmic 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride by use of a Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer in clinically normal horses.
Kalf KL; Utter ME; Wotman KL
Am J Vet Res; 2008 Dec; 69(12):1655-8. PubMed ID: 19046014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Normal corneal sensitivity and its changes with age in Tehran, Iran.
Mirzajan A; Khezri F; Jafarzadehpur E; Karimian F; Khabazkhoob M
Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Jan; 98(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 25545948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
