145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7360961)
1. Evaluation of absorbed dose in mammography: monte carlo simulation studies.
Doi K; Chan HP
Radiology; 1980 Apr; 135(1):199-208. PubMed ID: 7360961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.
Boone JM
Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 10540637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements.
Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography.
Wu X; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 2006265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Monte Carlo study of monoenergetic and polyenergetic normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients in mammography.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; Di Lillo F; Russo P
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(1):306-325. PubMed ID: 27991451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Normalized average glandular dose in magnification mammography.
Liu B; Goodsitt M; Chan HP
Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7568836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Dance DR; Thilander AK; Sandborg M; Skinner CL; Castellano IA; Carlsson GA
Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of absorbed radiation dose in refraction-enhanced breast tomosynthesis by a Laue case analyser.
Sato H; Ando M; Shimao D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):231-3. PubMed ID: 21515613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Review of Kerma-Area Product and total energy incident on patients in radiography, mammography and CT.
Yao H; Huda W; Mah E; He W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Feb; 163(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 24821931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Monte Carlo calculation of integral radiation dose in xeromammography.
Dance DR
Phys Med Biol; 1980 Jan; 25(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 7360790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo calculation of monoenergetic and polyenergetic DgN coefficients for mean glandular dose estimates in mammography using a homogeneous breast model.
Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Russo P
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(12):125012. PubMed ID: 31141793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of scatter-to-primary ratio, grid performance and normalized average glandular dose in mammography by Monte Carlo simulation including interference and energy broadening effects.
Cunha DM; Tomal A; Poletti ME
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(15):4335-59. PubMed ID: 20647608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Absorbed radiation dose in mammography.
Hammerstein GR; Miller DW; White DR; Masterson ME; Woodard HQ; Laughlin JS
Radiology; 1979 Feb; 130(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 760167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Absorption dose in scintimammography and in X-rays mammography].
Lyra M; Vamvakas I; Gavriilelli M; Chatzigiannis C
Hell J Nucl Med; 2010; 13(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20411183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scatter/primary in mammography: Monte Carlo validation.
Boone JM; Cooper VN
Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1818-31. PubMed ID: 10984229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The Difference in Backscatter Factors of Diagnostic X-rays by the Difference in the Scattering Medium and in the Objective Dose].
Kato H; Sakai K; Uchiyama M; Suzuki K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016; 72(10):1007-1014. PubMed ID: 27760900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.
Boone JM; Nelson TR; Lindfors KK; Seibert JA
Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):657-67. PubMed ID: 11719660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.
Wu X; Gingold EL; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8090926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
