145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7360961)
21. Monte Carlo simulation of average glandular dose and an investigation of influencing factors.
Nigapruke K; Puwanich P; Phaisangittisakul N; Youngdee W
J Radiat Res; 2010; 51(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 20523013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Study of the formalism used to determine the absorbed dose for low-energy x-ray beams.
Chica U; Anguiano M; Lallena AM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6963-77. PubMed ID: 19001702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dose evaluation of selective collimation effect in cephalography by measurement and Monte Carlo simulation.
Lee B; Shin G; Kang S; Shin B; Back I; Park H; Park C; Lee J; Lee W; Choi J; Park R; Kim Y
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 21335329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms.
Dance DR; Hunt RA; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):359-63. PubMed ID: 15933137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Absorbed dose in xeromammography.
Zárand P; Péntek Z
Br J Radiol; 1980 Feb; 53(626):114-9. PubMed ID: 7370491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of dose heterogeneity on radiation risk in medical imaging.
Samei E; Li X; Chen B; Reiman R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 23118440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radiation dose in diagnostic radiology: Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Chan HP; Doi K
Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 6482844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Average glandular dose conversion coefficients for segmented breast voxel models.
Zankl M; Fill U; Hoeschen C; Panzer W; Regulla D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):410-4. PubMed ID: 15933148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Physical validation of UF-RIPSA: A rapid in-clinic peak skin dose mapping algorithm for fluoroscopically guided interventions.
Borrego D; Marshall EL; Tran T; Siragusa DA; Bolch WE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):343-350. PubMed ID: 29577612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Monte Carlo evaluation of glandular dose in cone-beam X-ray computed tomography dedicated to the breast: Homogeneous and heterogeneous breast models.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; Tucciariello RM; Bliznakova K; Boone JM; Sechopoulos I; Di Lillo F; Russo P
Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():99-107. PubMed ID: 29885958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data.
Boone JM
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):869-75. PubMed ID: 12033583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Monte Carlo simulation for correlation analysis of average glandular dose by breast thickness and glandular ratio in breast tissue.
Kim ST; Cho JK
Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 24704647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Monte Carlo-derived TLD cross-calibration factors for treatment verification and measurement of skin dose in accelerated partial breast irradiation.
Garnica-Garza HM
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1621-31. PubMed ID: 19229101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Tenth value layers for 60Co gamma rays and for 4, 6, 10, 15, and 18 MV x rays in concrete for beams of cone angles between 0 degrees and 14 degrees calculated by Monte Carlo simulation.
Jaradat AK; Biggs PJ
Health Phys; 2007 May; 92(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 17429304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Radiation doses from low energy X-ray beams measured with synthetic diamond compared with calculated values obtained from the PENELOPE Monte Carlo code.
Assiamah M; Nam TL; Keddy RJ
Appl Radiat Isot; 2007 Aug; 65(8):952-8. PubMed ID: 17482827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography.
Haus AG; Metz CE; Chiles JT; Rossmann K
Radiology; 1976 Mar; 118(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 1251024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Backscatter factors and mass energy-absorption coefficient ratios for diagnostic radiology dosimetry.
Benmakhlouf H; Bouchard H; Fransson A; Andreo P
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 56(22):7179-204. PubMed ID: 22024474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
