145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7360961)
41. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Tungsten anode tubes with K-edge filters for mammography.
Beaman S; Lillicrap SC; Price JL
Br J Radiol; 1983 Oct; 56(670):721-7. PubMed ID: 6616137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. DOSE DISTRIBUTION IN A BREAST UNDERGOING MAMMOGRAPHY BASED ON A 3D DETAILED BREAST MODEL FOR CHINESE WOMEN.
Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Feng Z; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Oct; 181(3):221-228. PubMed ID: 29438509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.
Ducote JL; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5411-8. PubMed ID: 19175100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Radiation dose in mammography: an energy-balance approach.
Shrivastava PN
Radiology; 1981 Aug; 140(2):483-90. PubMed ID: 7255726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Monte Carlo simulation studies of backscatter factors in mammography.
Chan HP; Doi K
Radiology; 1981 Apr; 139(1):195-9. PubMed ID: 7208922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Analysis of Scattered Radiation in an Irradiated Body by Means of the Monte Carlo Simulation: Back-scatter Factors of Diagnostic X-rays in the Incident Surface Which is Not Flat].
Kato H; Minami K; Asada Y; Suzuki S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 May; 72(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 27211084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. DOSIS: a Monte Carlo simulation program for dose related studies in mammography.
Delis H; Spyrou G; Panayiotakis G; Tzanakos G
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 15899338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.
Dance DR; Young KC; van Engen RE
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jan; 56(2):453-71. PubMed ID: 21191150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Measured low-energy x-ray spectra of interest in diagnostic radiology and mammography.
Hernandez-Guzman A; Moreno-Ramírez A; Massillon-Jl G
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Oct; 67(21):. PubMed ID: 36179707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity.
Geeraert N; Klausz R; Muller S; Bloch I; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):342-5. PubMed ID: 25897143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [An improved method for determining the mean parenchyma dose in mammography].
Klein R; Aichinger H; Joite-Barfuss S; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):394-7. PubMed ID: 8580142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Skin models and their impact on mean glandular dose in mammography.
Massera RT; Tomal A
Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():38-47. PubMed ID: 29673742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Incident air kerma to absorbed organ dose conversion factors for breast and lung in PA thorax radiography: The effect of patient thickness and radiation quality.
Kelaranta A; Toroi P; Vock P
Phys Med; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1594-1601. PubMed ID: 27914781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Entrance skin exposure and mean glandular dose: effect of scatter and field gradient at mammography.
Ng KH; Aus RJ; DeWerd LA; Vetter JR
Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 9356619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Some properties of photon scattering in water phantoms in diagnostic radiology.
Chan HP; Doi K
Med Phys; 1986; 13(6):824-30. PubMed ID: 3796478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. WAXS fat subtraction model to estimate differential linear scattering coefficients of fatless breast tissue: phantom materials evaluation.
Tang RY; Laamanen C; McDonald N; LeClair RJ
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):053501. PubMed ID: 24784407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose.
Dance DR
Phys Med Biol; 1990 Sep; 35(9):1211-9. PubMed ID: 2236205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. New electron backscatter correction factors for accurate skin depth dose calculation from skin contamination by hot particles.
Chibani O
Health Phys; 2001 Oct; 81(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 11569636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Target-filter combination effects on breast tissue characterization using mammographic X-rays: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Elshemey WM; Saif RA; Elfiky AA
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(4):823-834. PubMed ID: 35599527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
