These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7360961)

  • 61. Backscatter factors for mammography calculated with Monte Carlo methods.
    Kramer R; Drexler G; Petoussi-Henss N; Zankl M; Regulla D; Panzer W
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Mar; 46(3):771-81. PubMed ID: 11277224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Calculation of dose conversion factors for posterior-anterior chest radiography of adults with a relatively high-energy X-ray spectrum.
    Schultz FW; Geleijns J; Zoetelief J
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Aug; 67(800):775-85. PubMed ID: 8087483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [A presumption calculating formula of the X-ray spectrum generated from a molybdenum target X-ray tube].
    Kato H; Fujii S; Shirakawa S; Suzuki Y; Nishii Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 21471675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Evaluation of radiation doses in mammography].
    Lee SK; Hwang SK; Lee LN; Lou GC; Wang CA; Hsu WJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1993 Mar; 51(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 8490794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A Monte Carlo study of the interaction of external beam X-radiation with inhomogeneous media.
    Webb S; Parker RP
    Phys Med Biol; 1978 Nov; 23(6):1043-59. PubMed ID: 733894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Performance of x-ray generators and unnecessary dose in mammography.
    Karila KT
    Radiology; 1982 Jul; 144(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 7089296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Effective dose and breast dose reduction in paediatric scoliosis X-ray radiography by an optimal positioning.
    Ben-Shlomo A; Bartal G; Shabat S; Mosseri M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 156(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 23511710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Calculation of patient dose and somatic dose index due to roentgen examinations.
    Servomaa A; Kainulainen E
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 3838356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. An investigation into the impact of anatomical variation upon mean glandular dose produced within a standard breast.
    Wilkinson LE; Heggie JC; Johnston PN
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1999 Jun; 22(2):53-63. PubMed ID: 10474976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Determination of X-ray spectra incident on and transmitted through breast tissue.
    Haus AG; Metz CE; Doi K; Bernstein J
    Radiology; 1977 Aug; 124(2):511-3. PubMed ID: 877294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Radiation dose in breast CT imaging with monochromatic x-rays: simulation study of the influence of energy, composition and thickness.
    Mittone A; Bravin A; Coan P
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 May; 59(9):2199-217. PubMed ID: 24710764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Monte Carlo calculations of monoenergetic electron depth dose distributions in LiF chips: skin dose correction factors for beta rays.
    Horowitz YS; Hirning CR; Yuen P; Wong P
    Health Phys; 1994 Oct; 67(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 8083045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The dose to the patient and the quality of the image in xeromammography.
    Ramsden JA; Moores BM; Asbury DL
    Br J Radiol; 1979 Oct; 52(622):804-9. PubMed ID: 509027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Parametrized x-ray absorption in diagnostic radiology from Monte Carlo calculations: implications for x-ray detector design.
    Boone JM
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(6):1467-73. PubMed ID: 1461211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The dependence of the scattered radiation dose to personnel on technique factors in diagnostic radiology.
    Marshall NW; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Jan; 65(769):44-9. PubMed ID: 1486367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Effects of x-ray beam equalization on mammographic imaging.
    Lam KL; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(2):242-9. PubMed ID: 2333050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Lung dose corrections for 6- and 15-MV x rays.
    Mackie TR; el-Khatib E; Battista J; Scrimger J; Van Dyk J; Cunningham JR
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 3925308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Mammographic practice and dosimetry in Britain.
    Fitzgerald M; White DR; White E; Young J
    Br J Radiol; 1981 Mar; 54(639):212-20. PubMed ID: 7470783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Effect of breast composition on patient exposure in mammography].
    Asada Y; Suzuki S; Yamada M; Sakurai K; Susa H; Maeda S; Ito M; Takeuchi Y; Shirakawa H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Dec; 60(12):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15614218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in mammography.
    Ng KP; Kwok CS; Tang FH
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 May; 45(5):1309-18. PubMed ID: 10843106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.