These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7360962)
1. Enhancement of video images. Baily NA; Nachazel RJ Radiology; 1980 Apr; 135(1):209-14. PubMed ID: 7360962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Edge enhancement algorithm for low-dose X-ray fluoroscopic imaging. Lee MS; Park CH; Kang MG Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Dec; 152():45-52. PubMed ID: 29054260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-image camera for spot radiography at fluoroscopic examinations. Hynes DM; Edmonds EW; Krametz KR; Baranoski D; Hughes T Radiology; 1980 Jul; 136(1):213-8. PubMed ID: 7384502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Bi-dimensional correction of x-ray images]. Ivanov VS; Zhukov EM; Kozlovskiĭ EB; Mazurov AI Med Tekh; 1975; (2):16-9. PubMed ID: 1226087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effect of technical conditions on the informative value of the image in radiography with the aid of electron-optic amplifier (experimental study)]. Telichko FF; Matula P Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1977; (1):76-80. PubMed ID: 867795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Noise analysis of a digital radiography system. Arnold BA; Scheibe PO AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):609-13. PubMed ID: 6364749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors. Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of a television digital noise reduction device on fluoroscopic image quality and dose rate. Jaffe CC; Orphanoudakis SC; Ablow RC Radiology; 1982 Sep; 144(4):789-92. PubMed ID: 7111727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Objective performance measurements versus perceived image quality in intensified fluoroscopic or photospot images. Gould RG; Belanger B; Goldberg HI; Moss A Radiology; 1980 Dec; 137(3):783-8. PubMed ID: 7444062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: digital fluoroscopy. Pooley RA; McKinney JM; Miller DA Radiographics; 2001; 21(2):521-34. PubMed ID: 11259716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Use of digital technology in x-ray television imaging]. Leonov BI; Blinov NN; Burakov OB; Kozlovskiĭ EB; Kuzin VS Med Tekh; 1989; (2):3-10. PubMed ID: 2747497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics. Chotas HG; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):595-9. PubMed ID: 10207454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Double contrast radiography of the stomach using a radiographic image intensifier]. Kormano M Duodecim; 1974; 90(10):786-93. PubMed ID: 4409271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fluoroscopic dose reduction using a digital television noise-reduction device. Ablow RC; Jaffe CC; Orphanoudakis SC; Markowitz RI; Rosenfield NS Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):313-5. PubMed ID: 6682983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns. Ishida M; Doi K; Loo LN; Metz CE; Lehr JL Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 6691118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]