These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7363632)

  • 1. Influence of ventilation phase on transthoracic impedance and defibrillation effectiveness.
    Ewy GA; Hellman DA; McClung S; Taren D
    Crit Care Med; 1980 Mar; 8(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 7363632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance.
    Zhang Y; Rhee B; Davies LR; Zimmerman MB; Snyder D; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2006 Feb; 68(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16325983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrode pad size, transthoracic impedance and success of external ventricular defibrillation.
    Dalzell GW; Cunningham SR; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Am J Cardiol; 1989 Oct; 64(12):741-4. PubMed ID: 2801525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation.
    Dalzell GW; Adgey AA
    Br Heart J; 1991 Jun; 65(6):311-6. PubMed ID: 2054239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disposable defibrillator electrodes.
    Ewy GA; Horan WJ; Ewy MD
    Heart Lung; 1977; 6(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 583893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of respiration phase on ventricular defibrillation threshold in a hot can electrode system.
    Yamanouchi Y; Mowrey KA; Kroll MW; Brewer JE; Donohoo AM; Niebauer MJ; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jun; 21(6):1216-24. PubMed ID: 9633063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transthoracic impedance does not decrease with rapidly repeated countershocks in a swine cardiac arrest model.
    Niemann JT; Garner D; Lewis RJ
    Resuscitation; 2003 Jan; 56(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 12505744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transthoracic defibrillation: importance of avoiding electrode placement directly on the female breast.
    Pagan-Carlo LA; Spencer KT; Robertson CE; Dengler A; Birkett C; Kerber RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Feb; 27(2):449-52. PubMed ID: 8557919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation, resuscitation or survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a non-escalating biphasic waveform defibrillator.
    White RD; Blackwell TH; Russell JK; Snyder DE; Jorgenson DB
    Resuscitation; 2005 Jan; 64(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 15629557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial experience with a microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator.
    Dalzell GW; Cunningham SR; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Br Heart J; 1989 Jun; 61(6):502-5. PubMed ID: 2757862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of transthoracic impedance during real cardiac arrest defibrillation attempts in older children and adolescents: are stacked-shocks appropriate?
    Niles DE; Nishisaki A; Sutton RM; Brunner S; Stavland M; Mahadevaiah S; Meaney PA; Maltese MR; Berg RA; Nadkarni VM
    Resuscitation; 2010 Nov; 81(11):1540-3. PubMed ID: 20708836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pediatric defibrillation: current flow is improved by using "adult" electrode paddles.
    Atkins DL; Kerber RE
    Pediatrics; 1994 Jul; 94(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 8008545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transthoracic electrical impedance during external defibrillation: comparison of measured and modelled waveforms.
    Al Hatib F; Trendafilova E; Daskalov I
    Physiol Meas; 2000 Feb; 21(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 10720010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrospective evaluation of current-based impedance compensation defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Chen B; Yin C; Ristagno G; Quan W; Tan Q; Freeman G; Li Y
    Resuscitation; 2013 May; 84(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 23000364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors determining success and energy requirements for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: revised version.
    Dalzell GW; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Q J Med; 1991 Jan; 78(285):85-95. PubMed ID: 1670068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of defibrillation efficacy between different impedance compensation techniques in high impedance porcine model.
    Li Y; Ristagno G; Yu T; Bisera J; Weil MH; Tang W
    Resuscitation; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1312-7. PubMed ID: 19720442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defibrillator electrode-chest wall coupling agents: influence on transthoracic impedance and shock success.
    Aylward PE; Kieso R; Hite P; Charbonnier F; Kerber RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Sep; 6(3):682-6. PubMed ID: 4031281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated impedance-based energy adjustment for defibrillation: experimental studies.
    Kerber RE; McPherson D; Charbonnier F; Kieso R; Hite P
    Circulation; 1985 Jan; 71(1):136-40. PubMed ID: 3964715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Defibrillation probability and impedance change between shocks during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Walker RG; Koster RW; Sun C; Moffat G; Barger J; Dodson PP; Chapman FW
    Resuscitation; 2009 Jul; 80(7):773-7. PubMed ID: 19423211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors determining success and energy requirements for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
    Dalzell GW; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Q J Med; 1990 Sep; 76(281):903-13. PubMed ID: 2236476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.