103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 736527)
1. The role of judges in life/death decisions for the neurologically impaired.
Beresford HR
Ann Neurol; 1978 Nov; 4(5):463-4. PubMed ID: 736527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases.
Buchanan A
Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Carroll PR
Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical paternalism and the rule of law: a reply to Dr. Relman.
Baron CH
Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):337-65. PubMed ID: 507055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
Bennett SA
Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Saikewicz decision: a medical viewpoint.
Relman AS
Am J Law Med; 1978; 4(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 736045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. More on appropriate decision making for the terminally ill incompetent patient.
Norris JA
Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):i-vi. PubMed ID: 507059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath.
Glantz LH; Swazey JP
Forum Med; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 10289145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Saikewica and Dinnerstein: the decisions.
Cushing M
Mass Nurse; 1979 Apr; 48(4):19-20. PubMed ID: 253883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Judicial postponement of death recognition: the tragic case of Mary O'Connor.
Gindes D
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):301-31. PubMed ID: 2513713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Judges at the bedside: the case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Annas GJ
Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 10289106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Refusing treatment for incompetent patients; why Quinlan and Saikewicz cases agree on roles of guardians, physicians, judges, and ethics committees.
Annas GJ
N Y State J Med; 1980 Apr; 80(5):816-21. PubMed ID: 6930563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
Murphy JG
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Constitutional law--right to refuse medical treatment--decisions to terminate life-prolonging treatment for incompetent patients--In re Spring, No. 2030 (Mass. order of Jan. 14, 1980).
Lubinsky MS
West New Engl Law Rev; 1980; 2(4):759-74. PubMed ID: 11649558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The judicial role in life-sustaining medical treatment decisions.
Hafemeister TL; Keilitz I; Banks SM
Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(1):53-72. PubMed ID: 1856072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Legal, moral concerns in life-support treatment decisions.
Kassekert R
Health Prog; 1984 Sep; 65(8):44-9, 60-2. PubMed ID: 10317515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deciding for the incompetent patient: the role of family members.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1984 Jul; 48(7):477. PubMed ID: 6467937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Life and death decisions: a reply to Judge Peccarelli.
Kramer IR
John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):569-83. PubMed ID: 16622960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
