103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 736527)
21. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
Hyland WF; Baime DS
Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. From Quinlan to Jobes: the courts and the PVS patient.
Armstrong PW; Colen BD
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 3350650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The insane root takes reason prisoner.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 2497081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers.
White DB; Curtis JR; Lo B; Luce JM
Crit Care Med; 2006 Aug; 34(8):2053-9. PubMed ID: 16763515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Terminating life support for mentally retarded, critically ill patients: the prosecutor's perspective.
Nesbitt JB
J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):245-65. PubMed ID: 6981678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Doctors, families and difficult decisions: the implications of the Lawrance case.
Nocon JJ
Indiana Med; 1991 Nov; 84(11):808-10. PubMed ID: 1761855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Incompetent's right to die: who decides?
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1979 Sep; 53(17):39, 42. PubMed ID: 457072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
Dippel DL
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1987 developments. National Legal Center Staff.
Issues Law Med; 1988; 3(4):333-60. PubMed ID: 2967805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Court responses to withholding or withdrawing artificial nutrition and fluids.
Paris JJ; Reardon FE
JAMA; 1985 Apr; 253(15):2243-5. PubMed ID: 3919194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
Feenan D
J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Supreme Court decision In respect of a Ward of Court.
O'Brien T
J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(6):183, 187. PubMed ID: 11657819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The ethics of Cruzan. Families, not states, should make treatment termination decisions.
Brodeur D
Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):42-7. PubMed ID: 10107438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. What does Cruzan mean to the practicing physician?
White BD; Siegler M; Singer PA; Iserson KV
Arch Intern Med; 1991 May; 151(5):925-8. PubMed ID: 2025139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nancy Cruzan in China.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):39-41. PubMed ID: 2228588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cancer nursing and the law. Discontinuance of life-prolonging measures for patients who are not competent to consent: the case of Benjamin C. Part I.
Gargaro WJ
Cancer Nurs; 1979 Oct; 2(5):387-8. PubMed ID: 261043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminal ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part I.
Suber DG; Tabor WJ
JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(18):2250-1. PubMed ID: 7131676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Life and death choices after Cruzan: case law and standards of professional conduct.
Gostin L; Weir RF
Milbank Q; 1991; 69(1):143-73. PubMed ID: 2034182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Cancer nursing and the law. Discontinuance of life-prolonging measures for patients who are not competent to consent. The case of Benjamin C. Part II.
Gargaro WJ
Cancer Nurs; 1979 Dec; 2(6):489-90. PubMed ID: 259445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
