These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. On the form of stimulus generalization curves for visual intensity. Ernst AJ; Engberg L; Thomas DR J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Sep; 16(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 5121854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency of reinforcement as a determinant of extinction-induced aggression during errorless discrimination learning. Rilling M; Caplan HJ J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jan; 23(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 1167899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resurgence without overall worsening of alternative reinforcement. Nighbor TD; Oliver AC; Lattal KA Behav Processes; 2020 Oct; 179():104219. PubMed ID: 32777262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the key-peck and treadle-press operants in the pigeon: differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule of reinforcement. Richardson WK; Clark DB J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Sep; 26(2):237-56. PubMed ID: 16811945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The peak shift in stimulus generalization: equivalent effects of errors and noncontingent shock. Grusec T J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 5660704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential resurgence and response elimination. Doughty AH; da Silva SP; Lattal KA Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 17395402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Response factors in delay discounting: evidence for Pavlovian influences on delay discounting in pigeons. Holt DD; Carlson JD; Follett VL; Jerdee NJ; Kelley DP; Muhich KM; Tiry AM; Reetz NK Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():37-43. PubMed ID: 23618788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of variable-interval value and amount of training on stimulus generalization. Walker DJ; Branch MN J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Sep; 70(2):139-63. PubMed ID: 9768505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies? Nevin JA; Tota ME; Torquato RD; Shull RL J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 2341820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiple schedules, off-baseline reinforcement shifts, and resistance to extinction. Craig AR; Shahan TA J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):148-163. PubMed ID: 29293265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules. Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence of interaction between deprivation effects and stimulus control. Powell RW J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jul; 16(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 5142390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suboptimal choice by pigeons is eliminated when key-pecking behavior is replaced by treadle-pressing. González-Torres R; Flores J; Orduña V Behav Processes; 2020 Sep; 178():104157. PubMed ID: 32497555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of ultraviolet radiation on the pigeon's color discrimination. Wright AA J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 May; 17(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 5033890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pausing as an operant: choice and discriminated responding. Craig AR; Lattal KA; Hall EG J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 24436113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of stimulus control and deprivation upon discriminative responding. Powell RW J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Mar; 19(2):351-60. PubMed ID: 4706239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]