These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7365404)

  • 1. Visual attention in retarded adults: combining stimuli which control incompatible behavior.
    Huguenin NH; Touchette PE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jan; 33(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 7365404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Haptic attention and visual transfer by mentally retarded and nonretarded individuals.
    Tomiser JM; Hollis JH; Monaco GE
    Am J Ment Defic; 1983 Jan; 87(4):448-55. PubMed ID: 6829623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing overselective attention to compound visual cues with extended training in adolescents with severe mental retardation.
    Huguenin NH
    Res Dev Disabil; 2000; 21(2):93-113. PubMed ID: 10817417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective attention to visual compound stimuli in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).
    Ploog BO
    Behav Processes; 2011 May; 87(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 21215303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informational determinants of social reinforcement effectiveness among retarded children.
    Cairns RB; Paris SG
    Am J Ment Defic; 1971 Nov; 76(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 5148368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention to multiple cues by severely mentally retarded adults: effects of single-component pretraining.
    Huguenin NH
    Appl Res Ment Retard; 1985; 6(3):319-35. PubMed ID: 4037790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Employing computer technology to assess visual attention in young children and adolescents with severe mental retardation.
    Huguenin NH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 May; 65(2):141-70. PubMed ID: 9169208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shared attention in pigeons.
    Maki WS; Leith CR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Mar; 19(2):345-9. PubMed ID: 4706238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention in the pigeon: testing for excitatory and inhibitory control by the weak elements.
    Kendall SB; Mills WA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 May; 31(3):421-31. PubMed ID: 469465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Element and compound matching-to-sample performance in pigeons: the roles of information load and training history.
    Brown MF; Morrison SK
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Apr; 16(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 2335772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Method of stimulus combination impacts resistance to extinction.
    Podlesnik CA; Bai JY
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):30-47. PubMed ID: 25929758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing control by elements of complex stimuli in delayed matching to sample.
    Stromer R; McIlvane WJ; Dube WV; Mackay HA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jan; 59(1):83-102. PubMed ID: 8433067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditional discrimination with ambiguous stimuli.
    Meltzer D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Mar; 39(2):241-9. PubMed ID: 6842128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A conjoint-measurement analysis of control by dimensions of compound stimuli.
    Rodewald HK
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Apr; 38(2):551-6. PubMed ID: 4824091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Observing responses maintained by conditional discriminative stimuli.
    Ohta A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Nov; 48(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 3430109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of conditioning history on selective stimulus control by elements of compound discriminative stimuli.
    Ryan CS; Hemmes NS; Brown BL
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jul; 87(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 21726605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effects of verbal reinforcement combinations on discrimination learning and discrimination shift learning in normal and mentally retarded children].
    Matsuda M; Matsuda F
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1967 Oct; 38(4):190-201. PubMed ID: 5626110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of fading procedures on discrimination shifts.
    Nolan JD; Harris AE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1981 May; 7(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 7241062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do chickens (Gallus gallus f. domestica) decompose visual figures?
    Werner CW; Tiemann I; Cnotka J; Rehkämper G
    Anim Cogn; 2005 Apr; 8(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 15490291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Divided attention and the matching law: sample duration affects sensitivity to reinforcement allocation.
    Shahan TA; Podlesnik CA
    Learn Behav; 2007 Aug; 35(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 17918419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.