These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7368551)
1. [Rare-earth, 2d-generation image enhancement screens and their use in x-ray study of the gastrointestinal tract]. Birman TA; Golovkova SI; Gurvich AM; Kameneva SI; Katomina RV Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1980; (1):69-73. PubMed ID: 7368551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Reduction of radiation dosage by the use of newer reinforced rare earth films]. Hofmann T Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1987; 19(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 3474210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical comparison of conventional and rare earth screen-film systems for cephalometric radiographs. Kaugars GE; Fatouros P Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Mar; 53(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 6950349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Importance of rare earth screens for optimizing radiographic imaging quality]. Keller U Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1986 Jan; 41(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 3460773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Use of rare-earth intensifying screens in x-ray studies of children]. Gurvich AM; Soshchin NP; Tsyplenkov VG; Berliant NIa; Golovkova SI Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1979; (1):69-74. PubMed ID: 425307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Rare-earth screens versus calcium tungstate screens. Wilson RA Radiology; 1983 Apr; 147(1):288-9. PubMed ID: 6828754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Uroradiographic dosimetry using a rare-earth screen-film system. Segal AJ; Maillie HD; Lemkin JA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Nov; 139(5):923-6. PubMed ID: 6981976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rare earth filtration: spectral distributions, exposure reduction and image quality effects for panoramic radiography. Tyndall DA Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1987; 16(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3472971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Modern film screen systems of rare earths in clinical radiology]. Freyschmidt J Rontgenpraxis; 1981; 34(6):227-33. PubMed ID: 7268571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Technical notes. Test of rare earth oxysulphide intensifying screens. Soila P; Edgren J; Landtman M; Laasonen L Br J Radiol; 1977 Mar; 50(591):205-7. PubMed ID: 849522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. National survey with regard to preferred image characteristics of various types of intensifying screens. van der Zwaag H Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1984; 53(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 6565544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exposure reduction and image quality for pantomographic radiography. Tyndall DA; Bedsole SM Radiol Technol; 1987; 59(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 3659339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical comparison of high-speed rare-earth screen and par-speed screen for diagnostic efficacy and radiation dosage. Robinson T; Becker JA; Olson AP Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):214-6. PubMed ID: 6821592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [New intensifying films in roentgen diagnosis. A clinically oriented evaluation of rare earth films in comparison to conventional films]. Beyer HK; Schulze B Rontgenpraxis; 1981 Sep; 34(9):387-94. PubMed ID: 7302710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Reduction of the radiation exposure in photofluorography by using rare earth-based fluorescent screens]. Schöfer H; Eder H Rofo; 1984 Aug; 141(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 6431550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of kilovoltage on the relative speed of rare-earth screens. Thunthy KH; Weinberg R Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 3460902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]