These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7369185)

  • 21. Effect of pneumatic tube delivery system rate and distance on hemolysis of blood specimens.
    Evliyaoğlu O; Toprak G; Tekin A; Başarali MK; Kilinç C; Colpan L
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2012 Feb; 26(2):66-9. PubMed ID: 22467320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Evaluation of the direct antiglobulin test].
    Juraković-Loncar N; Hundrić-Haspl Z; Balija M; Grgicević D
    Lijec Vjesn; 1995; 117(11-12):274-7. PubMed ID: 8691973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An episode of increased hemolysis due to a defective pneumatic air tube delivery system.
    Ellis G
    Clin Biochem; 2009 Aug; 42(12):1265-9. PubMed ID: 19445913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of hydroxyethyl starch on erythrocyte typing and blood crossmatching.
    Daniels MJ; Strauss RG; Smith-Floss AM
    Transfusion; 1982; 22(3):226-8. PubMed ID: 6178192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implementation of a pneumatic-tube system for transport of blood specimens.
    Poznanski W; Smith F; Bodley F
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1978 Aug; 70(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 696689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of Pneumatic Tube Transport on Blood Gas and Supplemental Analytes.
    Jensen PR; Aramaki RL; Mannebach SC; Markewitz BA
    Respir Care; 2021 Oct; 66(10):1567-1571. PubMed ID: 33688092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of a soft-handling computerized pneumatic tube specimen delivery system. Effects on analytical results and turnaround time.
    Keshgegian AA; Bull GE
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 Apr; 97(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 1553919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Type and screen method and Coombs crossmatch method for pretransfusion testing: A prospective comparative study in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi.
    Anu KD; Pahuja S; Sharma G
    Asian J Transfus Sci; 2022; 16(1):83-88. PubMed ID: 36199420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Blood type and screen for crossmatch].
    Taniwaki K
    Rinsho Byori; 1989 Jul; 37(7):745-9. PubMed ID: 2607645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Effect of Pneumatic Tube Systems on the Hemolysis of Biochemistry Blood Samples.
    Cakirca G; Erdal H
    J Emerg Nurs; 2017 May; 43(3):255-258. PubMed ID: 28359708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Comprehensive Blood Bank Survey of the College of American Pathologists--1978.
    Walker RH; Mullen SA; Myhre BA; Polesky HF; van der Hoeven LH; van Schoonhoven PV
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Oct; 74(4 Suppl):560-4. PubMed ID: 7435448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of a hospital-laboratory workstation for immunohematologic methods.
    Schoenfeld H; Pretzel KJ; von Heymann C; Neuner B; Kalus U; Kiesewetter H; Pruss A
    Transfusion; 2010 Jan; 50(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 19709392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of three low-ionic-strength solutions for routine pretransfusion testing: antibody screening/identification, cross-matching, immune anti-ABO detection, and direct antiglobulin tests.
    Kaspi E; Mallié F; Gouvitsos J; Dettori I; Chiaroni J; Ferrera V
    Transfusion; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2772-3. PubMed ID: 20163691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The 1980 comprehensive blood bank survey of the College of American Pathologists.
    Walker RH; Kuban DJ; Polesky HF; Van Der Hoeven LH
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Oct; 78(4 Suppl):610-4. PubMed ID: 6814237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Smartphone Application Monitoring of Acceleration Forces During Pneumatic Tube System Transport of Emergency Department Patient Samples.
    Heireman L; Stroobants J; Uyttenbroeck W; Goossens Y; Dreezen C; Luyts D; Broeck LVD; Delanghe J; Heylen E; Mahieu B
    Clin Lab; 2018 Jul; 64(7):1297-1304. PubMed ID: 30146841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimal blood grouping and antibody screening for safe transfusion.
    Makarovska-Bojadzieva T; Blagoevska M; Kolevski P; Kostovska S
    Prilozi; 2009 Jul; 30(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 19736535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pneumatic tube validation: Reducing the need for donor samples by integrating a vial-embedded data logger.
    Stangerup I; Broell F; Hoop JV; Sennels HP
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2021 Jul; 58(4):280-288. PubMed ID: 33478238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comprehensive Blood Bank Survey.
    Walker RH; Cooper ES; Hoeltge GA; de Jongh D; Kuban DJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1985 Mar; 109(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 3919685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Safety in transfusion practice. Is it safe to eliminate the major crossmatch for selected patients?
    Shulman IA; Kent D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Mar; 113(3):270-2. PubMed ID: 2919957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Blood Transfusion Selection in Patients with Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia Producing Class Antibodies].
    Ding QL; Chen BL; Qiu F
    Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 25(4):1208-1211. PubMed ID: 28823294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.