These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7369934)

  • 1. Influence of click sound pressure direction on brain stem responses in children.
    Ornitz EM; Mo A; Olson ST; Walter DO
    Audiology; 1980; 19(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 7369934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The frequency specificity of tone-pip evoked auditory brain stem responses.
    Kileny P
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):270-5. PubMed ID: 7308602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brainstem responses to tone pip and click stimuli.
    Bauch CD; Rose DE; Harner SG
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7409354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus waveforms used in brainstem response audiometry.
    Laukli E
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 6612216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of auditory brain stem response sources along the basilar membrane to low-frequency filtered clicks.
    Kinarti R; Sohmer H
    Isr J Med Sci; 1982 Jan; 18(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 7068347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximum length sequences -- a fast method for measuring brain-stem-evoked responses.
    Eysholdt U; Schreiner C
    Audiology; 1982; 21(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 7092727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of stimulus rise-time and polarity on the auditory brainstem responses.
    Salt AN; Thornton AR
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 6463551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Latencies of ABR (waves III and V) to binaural clicks: effects of interaural time and intensity differences.
    Rosenhamer HJ; Holmkvist C
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 6648317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of click duration of the latency of the early evoked response.
    Beattie RC; Boyd R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 6717010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between auditory brain stem responses evoked by rarefaction and condensation step functions and clicks.
    Tietze G; Pantev C
    Audiology; 1986; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 3954683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of measurements of SN-10 and the 40/sec middle latency responses in newborns.
    Shallop JK; Osterhammel PA
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 6612217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Click polarity inversion effects upon the human brainstem auditory evoked potential.
    Kevanishvili Z; Aphonchenko V
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 7302521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The indication for brain stem evoked response and the effect of click rate and stimulus intensity on the latencies of the auditory evoked potentials (author's transl)].
    Baschek V; Steinert W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Oct; 59(10):690-7. PubMed ID: 7453423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brainstem evoked responses to paired-click stimuli: the use of digital response subtraction.
    Burkard R; Deegan D
    Audiology; 1984; 23(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 6704062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of click polarity on ABR threshold.
    Sininger YS; Masuda A
    Ear Hear; 1990 Jun; 11(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 2358131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. I. The variability of the normal response.
    Rosenhamer HJ; Lindström B; Lundborg T
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 756085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Clicks by bone conduction versus bone-conducted masking for evaluations of brain stem auditory evoked potentials in pediatric patients].
    Ysunza A
    Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex; 1985 Feb; 42(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 3986037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). I: Effects of click level, rate, and polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2514-25. PubMed ID: 2745876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Air and bone conduction brain stem responses in adults and infants.
    Cornacchia L; Martini A; Morra B
    Audiology; 1983; 22(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 6651620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain stem potentials evoked by binaural click stimuli with differences in interaural time and intensity.
    Gerull G; Mrowinski D
    Audiology; 1984; 23(3):265-76. PubMed ID: 6732631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.