These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7371271)

  • 1. The effect of femoral stem cross-sectional geometry on cement stresses in total hip reconstruction.
    Crowninshield RD; Brand RA; Johnston RC; Milroy JC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980; (146):71-7. PubMed ID: 7371271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of variation of cement thickness on bone and cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
    Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    Iowa Orthop J; 1993; 13():155-9. PubMed ID: 7820736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of variation of prosthesis size on cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
    Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Sep; 28(9):1055-60. PubMed ID: 7814433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Femoral cement pressurization during total hip arthroplasty. The role of different femoral stems with reference to stem size and shape.
    Bourne RB; Oh I; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Mar; (183):12-6. PubMed ID: 6697578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis responsible to bone cement with customized prosthesis of proximal segmental femur].
    Liu Y; Tu CQ; Li XB; Duan H; Pei FX
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Mar; 38(2):324-7. PubMed ID: 17441361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Theoretical analysis of changes in femoral stresses after total hip arthroplasty].
    Yan S; Wu H; Yu S
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Jun; 23(3):530-4. PubMed ID: 16856384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stable partial debonding of the cement interfaces indicated by a finite element model of a total hip prosthesis.
    Lu Z; Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Sarmiento A
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Mar; 14(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 8648501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stiffness optimisation of cement and stem materials in total hip replacement.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2001; 11(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11281574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The load carrying and fatigue properties of the stem-cement interface with smooth and porous coated femoral components.
    Manley MT; Stern LS; Gurtowski J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985; 19(5):563-75. PubMed ID: 4066729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of stem length on mechanics of the femoral hip component after cemented revision.
    Mann KA; Ayers DC; Damron TA
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Jan; 15(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 9066528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cement strain measurement surrounding loose and well-fixed femoral component stems.
    Crowninshield RD; Tolbert JR
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 Sep; 17(5):819-28. PubMed ID: 6619178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of stem geometry on stresses within the distal cement mantle in total hip replacement.
    Schmölz W; Gordon DR; Shields AJ; Kirkwood D; Grigoris P
    Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 10942992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement.
    Davey JR; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Feb; 8(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 8436985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shape optimization of metal backing for cemented acetabular cup.
    Hedia HS; Abdel-Shafi AA; Fouda N
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 11086841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.