75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7371289)
1. Mechanical strength of the femur following resurfacing and conventional total hip replacement procedures.
Markolf KL; Amstutz HC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980; (147):170-80. PubMed ID: 7371289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Femoral component positioning in resurfacing arthroplasty--effects on cortical strains.
Kummer FJ; Pereira G; Schachter AK; Jaffe WL
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 20001936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.
Vail TP; Glisson RR; Dominguez DE; Kitaoka K; Ottaviano D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18762656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.
Thomsen MN; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M
Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):653. PubMed ID: 19292385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fatigue fracture of the femoral neck.
Nand S; Shukla RK
Int Surg; 1976 Jan; 61(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 1270203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component.
Davis ET; Olsen M; Zdero R; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Nov; 90(11):1522-7. PubMed ID: 18978277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement.
Anglin C; Masri BA; Tonetti J; Hodgson AJ; Greidanus NV
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():71-9. PubMed ID: 17589356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads.
Little JP; Taddei F; Viceconti M; Murray DW; Gill HS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):440-8. PubMed ID: 17257719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Axial loading studies of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.
Apel DM; Patwardhan A; Pinzur MS; Dobozi WR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Sep; (246):156-64. PubMed ID: 2766604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment. A biomechanical and clinical analysis.
Richards CJ; Giannitsios D; Huk OL; Zukor DJ; Steffen T; Antoniou J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():96-101. PubMed ID: 18676943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reaming versus broaching in cemented hip arthroplasty: mechanical stability in cadaver femora.
Ioannidis TT; Apostolou CD; Korres DS; Papaletsos I; Gandaifis ND; Panagopoulos CN; Agathocleous PE
Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 16156458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fatigue performance of composite analogue femur constructs under high activity loading.
Chong AC; Friis EA; Ballard GP; Czuwala PJ; Cooke FW
Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 35(7):1196-205. PubMed ID: 17390224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association of geometric factors and failure load level with the distribution of cervical vs. trochanteric hip fractures.
Pulkkinen P; Eckstein F; Lochmüller EM; Kuhn V; Jämsä T
J Bone Miner Res; 2006 Jun; 21(6):895-901. PubMed ID: 16753020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems.
Decking R; Puhl W; Simon U; Claes LE
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 16457913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of positioning and notching of resurfaced femurs on femoral neck strength: a biomechanical test.
Nabavi A; Yeoh KM; Shidiac L; Appleyard R; Gillies RM; Turnbull A
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2009 Apr; 17(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 19398793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conus hip prosthesis.
Wagner H; Wagner M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Creep dominates tensile fatigue damage of the cement-bone interface.
Kim DG; Miller MA; Mann KA
J Orthop Res; 2004 May; 22(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 15099645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
