These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7371872)

  • 1. The peer review system.
    Paque RE
    Fed Proc; 1980 May; 39(7):2350-1. PubMed ID: 7371872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The peer review system.
    Homburger F
    Fed Proc; 1980 May; 39(7):2349-50. PubMed ID: 7371871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The peer review system.
    Rutman JF
    Fed Proc; 1980 May; 39(7):2349. PubMed ID: 7371870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review: a crisis in confidence.
    Kirschstein RL
    Clin Res; 1986 Oct; 34(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 3780138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review in health services research: issues and problems.
    Eichhorn RL; Maurana CA
    Health Serv Res; 1981; 16(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 7298338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. National Institutes of Health: the lottery.
    Heilman KM
    Ann Neurol; 2007 Jul; 62(1):106. PubMed ID: 17474112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health.
    Kirschstein RL
    Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review of researchgrant applications at the National Institutes of Health 2: review by an initial review group.
    Henley C
    Fed Proc; 1977 Aug; 36(9):2186-90. PubMed ID: 885260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 1: the assignment and referral processes.
    Henley C
    Fed Proc; 1977 Jul; 36(8):2066-8. PubMed ID: 872944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 3: review by an advisory board/council.
    Henley C
    Fed Proc; 1977 Sep; 36(10):2335-8. PubMed ID: 892000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Editorial: The Peer Review System and NIH.
    Bucy PC
    Surg Neurol; 1976 May; 5(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 1265652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Letter: The National Institutes of Health grants peer review study team.
    Looney GL
    Am J Chin Med (Gard City N Y); 1976; 4(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 937242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent changes in NIH peer review system.
    Demsey A
    Physiologist; 1988 Dec; 31(6):155-6. PubMed ID: 3237781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH peer review system: facts and figures on study sections add up to trouble.
    Fed Proc; 1978 Aug; 37(10):1a-4a. PubMed ID: 581073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Remembering the peer in peer review.
    O'Connell KA
    Nurs Res; 1987; 36(6):379-80. PubMed ID: 3671127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Letter: Peer review system utilized by the NIH and the NSF.
    Fed Proc; 1973 Dec; 32(12):2142-3. PubMed ID: 4753768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparability of the American Cancer Society and National Institutes of Health peer review systems.
    Vivona S; Do van Quy D
    Cancer Res; 1973 Apr; 33(4):919. PubMed ID: 4739656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Moron peer review.
    Brenner S
    Curr Biol; 1999 Oct; 9(20):R755. PubMed ID: 10531042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review reviewed.
    Mehl JW
    Fed Proc; 1975 Aug; 34(9):i-iv. PubMed ID: 1149887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.