181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7371971)
1. Comparison of a paper pill with a conventional oral contraceptive tablet.
Basu HK; Edwards C
J Int Med Res; 1980; 8(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 7371971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postponement of withdrawal bleeding in women using low-dose combined oral contraceptives.
Hamerlynck JV; Vollebregt JA; Doornebos CM; Muntendam P
Contraception; 1987 Mar; 35(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 2956054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new ultra-low-dose combination oral contraceptive.
Woutersz TB
J Reprod Med; 1983 Jan; 28(1 Suppl):81-4. PubMed ID: 6403705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral contraceptive containing natural estradiol for premenopausal women.
Hirvonen E; Allonen H; Anttila M; Kulmala Y; Ranta T; Rautiainen H; Sipilä P; Ylöstalo P
Maturitas; 1995 Jan; 21(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7731379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.
Kirkman RJ; Bromham DR; O'Connor TP; Sahota JE
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):36-40. PubMed ID: 10454652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use and misuse of oral contraceptives: risk indicators for poor pill taking and discontinuation.
Rosenberg MJ; Waugh MS; Meehan TE
Contraception; 1995 May; 51(5):283-8. PubMed ID: 7628201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pill-a-month as an oral contraceptive.
Hefnawi F; Hassanein M; Younis N
Egypt Popul Fam Plann Rev; 1972 Jun; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 12256024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception.
Van Vliet H; Grimes D; Helmerhorst F; Schulz K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (4):CD003283. PubMed ID: 11687185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized double-blind trial of two low dose combined oral contraceptives.
Bounds W; Vessey M; Wiggins P
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Apr; 86(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 373792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception.
Van Vliet HA; Grimes DA; Helmerhorst FM; Schulz KF
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (2):CD003283. PubMed ID: 12804457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Women's knowledge of taking oral contraceptive pills correctly and of emergency contraception: effect of providing information leaflets in general practice.
Smith LF; Whitfield MJ
Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Aug; 45(397):409-14. PubMed ID: 7576845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An open assessment of a new low dose oestrogen combined oral contraceptive.
Hughes I
J Int Med Res; 1978; 6(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 627304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The 150/30 formulation. Experience in the United Kingdom.
Guillebaud J
J Reprod Med; 1983 Jan; 28(1 Suppl):66-70. PubMed ID: 6403702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Oral contraceptives: knowledge and compliance].
Koch T; Marslew U; Nielsen MR
Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Nov; 155(44):3546-50. PubMed ID: 8236575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Women's attitudes to withdrawal bleeding and their knowledge and beliefs about the oral contraceptive pill.
Rutter W; Knight C; Vizzard J; Mira M; Abraham S
Med J Aust; 1988 Oct; 149(8):417-9. PubMed ID: 3173203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The current status of oral contraceptive clinical development in Japan.
Kuwabara Y
Int J Fertil; 1989; 34 Suppl():18-20. PubMed ID: 2576251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contraceptive steroid effects on nonreproductive organ systems.
Corson SL
J Reprod Med; 1986 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):865-78. PubMed ID: 3772906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inadvertent pregnancies in oral contraceptive users.
Kovacs GT; Riddoch G; Duncombe P; Welberry L; Chick P; Weisberg E; Leavesley GM; Baker HW
Med J Aust; 1989 May; 150(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 2716563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The acceptability of current contraceptive methods to adolescents].
Sotnikova EI; Dubnitskaia LV; Perminova SG
Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1993; (3):26-30. PubMed ID: 8048682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The misunderstood pill: thirty years of testing and development have reduced pill's major, minor side effects.
United States. Centers for Disease Control CDC. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1986; 7(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 12341093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
