204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7372931)
1. Psychophysical tuning curves for combination tones 2f1-f2 and f2-f1.
Formby C; Sachs RM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1754-8. PubMed ID: 7372931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea.
Robles L; Ruggero MA; Rich NC
J Neurophysiol; 1997 May; 77(5):2385-99. PubMed ID: 9163365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
Nelson DA; Fortune TW
J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
Lai J; Bartlett EL
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combination tones and unmasking.
Tyler RS
Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 2(3-4):357-68. PubMed ID: 7410240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychophysical measures of two-tone suppression and distortion products (2f1-f2) and (f2-f1).
Humes LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):930-50. PubMed ID: 6841819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.
Siegel JH; Kim DO; Molnar CE
J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2).
Gibian GL; Kim DO
Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unmasking produced by combination tones.
Tyler RS; Small AM; Abbas PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Aug; 66(2):379-87. PubMed ID: 512201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea of the 'constant frequency' bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi.
Kössl M
Hear Res; 1994 Jan; 72(1-2):59-72. PubMed ID: 8150746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Growth of L(f2--f1) and L(2f1--f2) with input level: influence of f2/f1.
Humes LE
Hear Res; 1980 Mar; 2(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 7364667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychophysical two-tone suppression as a function of input level for f2/f1 greater than 1.0.
Humes LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1751-63. PubMed ID: 7372930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures.
Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Probst R; Scheinin SA; Coats AC
Hear Res; 1987; 28(2-3):191-208. PubMed ID: 3654389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones.
Mills DM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):507-23. PubMed ID: 9440336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
Abdala C
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cortical responses to the 2f1-f2 combination tone measured indirectly using magnetoencephalography.
Purcell DW; Ross B; Picton TW; Pantev C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):992-1003. PubMed ID: 17672647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
